🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
A powerful NCM Downloader that supports built-in metadata 一个强大的网易云下载工具，支持内嵌元信息（歌曲名，歌手，专辑，歌曲封面）
PythonKiraAI, a modular, multi-platform AI digital life that connects Large Language Models (LLMs) and various chat adapters (QQ, Telegram...)
PythonAn elegant personal honepage, revised from ZYYO homepage
HTMLAn elegant web page that displays your devices' status
Python科学上网基础教程
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 6-year account with 341 stars propped up by one NetEase cloud downloader, 8 of 13 high-star repo PRs are docs/frontend/i18n water work, score slashed 10 points straight from trustworthy to NPC — you'r
xxynet — 63.80/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A 6-year account whose star count and "ecosystem impact" are propped up by one downloader and a flood of docs/frontend tinkering on others' repos, with no real core engineering footprint to justify a higher score.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 6.39 years registered, 7 active contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — you've been on GitHub longer than most people have had smartphones, even if you've mostly used it to tinker with your own side project. |
| Original project quality | 12.5/18 | 341 total stars across 30 original repos, but 180 of those stars come from a single NCM downloader, and the rest of your home turf is a graveyard of sub-10-star tools and a VPN tutorial repo — one-hit wonder energy. |
| Contribution quality | 23.7/27 | 97 merged PRs out of 99 total, 0 maintainer rejections, 1 self-closed own-repo PR — no PR drama, but 87% of all your PRs target your own 63-star KiraAI repo, so your "contributions" are mostly self-serve tinkering. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 8/20 | 13 PRs + 38 commits into ★35k+ repos (all-time), but verified samples show 8 of those 13 contributions are docs/i18n/frontend/CSS tweaks, only 4 touch core code — you're polishing dashboards, not building engines. |
| Community influence | 3.5/8 | 21 followers, 33 following — a follow ratio that screams "I follow every open-source account I see, no one follows me back", zero community clout to speak of. |
| Activity authenticity | 16.1/17 | 861 contributions last year across 4 activity types — the activity is real, it's just almost entirely directed at your own pet project instead of meaningful external work. |
Red flags
- The raw unadjusted score of 73.8 was 13.8 points above the mandated impact quality cap of 60, meaning the base scoring heavily overvalued low-impact docs and frontend work on popular repos.
- 62% of all-time popular-repo contributions are docs/site/examples/templates/frontend UI changes, not core engineering — the "ecosystem impact" is mostly polishing other people's dashboards and READMEs.
- Verified file-level samples of high-star repo contributions include i18n JSON files, CSS tweaks, README edits, and template modifications, with no substantive core code changes in the inspected PRs.
- 87% of all PRs target the user's own 63-star KiraAI repo, meaning the bulk of contribution activity is self-directed tinkering rather than external impact.
Score calibration A mandatory 10-point haircut was applied because the impact quality cap requires the final score to stay at or below 60 when popular-repo contributions are dominated by docs/site/frontend work rather than core engineering. No other adjustments were made.
Verdict Needs human review — the raw score overvalued surface-level work on popular repos, and there is no verified core engineering impact to justify a higher tier. This profile reads like open-source resume theater, not substantive contribution.