Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 14-year-old GitHub account with only a 160-star Neovim plugin to show for it, 93% of PRs locked to your own repos, and just 1 doc patch to a 51k-star project as external impact — your open-source foot
magicalne — 72.00/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: 14-year GitHub veteran whose open-source impact is almost entirely confined to his own 160-star nvim.ai plugin, with barely any footprint in broader ecosystem projects — solid on home turf, a tourist everywhere else.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 14.1 years registered, 15 active contribution years, last push 12 days ago |
| Original project quality | 10/18 | 52 original repos, 182 total stars, top-starred nvim.ai scores a 0.69 quality rating with 160 stars, best-quality lightgbm-rs only nets 1 star |
| Contribution quality | 24.1/27 | 171 merged PRs out of 191 total, 5 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 13 self-closed external PRs, 1 self-closed own-repo PR; 93% of recent merged PRs target your own nvim.ai repo |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 10.3/20 | 1 PR + 1 commit across all-time popular repo contributions, both landing in 51,994-star LiteLLM as a documentation fix with zero core engineering work on high-star third-party projects |
| Community influence | 3.5/8 | 46 followers vs 101 following — a ratio that makes it clear you collect repos far more eagerly than fans |
| Activity authenticity | 14.1/17 | 1041 contributions in the past year, no PR flooding, trivial farming, or bot-like behavior detected |
Red flags
- All high-star external contribution is limited to a single documentation fix to LiteLLM (51,994 stars), with zero core engineering PRs to popular third-party projects.
- 93% of all merged PRs target your own nvim.ai repository, meaning your open-source impact is almost entirely self-contained with minimal spillover to broader projects.
- Follower count (46) is less than half of your following count (101), a classic signal of repo tourism over community building.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your limited external ecosystem impact and home-turf-focused contribution pattern, so no additional bump or haircut was applied.
Verdict Normal, low-risk account that builds usable personal projects but has negligible cross-project open-source impact. You’re a solid solo maintainer of your own tools, not a broad ecosystem contributor — no red flags, just very narrow public impact.