🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 90% of your PRs target 1-3 star MinersStudios repos, all your own projects are starless, and you're counting a tldr test page edit and Ukrainian translations as high-star impact — your GitHub resume i
PackmanDude — 64.70/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A low-impact contributor who trades outsourced water PRs for a GitHub persona, with zero stars on home turf and most of his "high-star" impact coming from trivial docs and localization edits on other people's projects.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 8.1/10 | Registered 4.4 years, contributions span 5 calendar years; plenty of time to build something worth starring, but you chose to farm PRs for other people's repos instead. |
| Original project quality | 3/18 | 2 nonempty original repos, 0 total stars, top repo is a dotfiles config folder with a 0.5 quality score — your home turf is a barren wasteland with not a single star to your name. |
| Contribution quality | 21/27 | 38 merged out of 60 total PRs; 8 maintainer-closed unmerged, 11 self-closed external, 1 self-closed own-repo. 9 trivial and 6 doc-like recent merged PRs — a quarter of your work is window dressing, and you've worn the maintainer close button smooth. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 16/20 | 6 PRs + 3 commits across 5 popular repos with 78,065 total stars, 4 additional contributions lacking file samples. Verified samples are 1 core PR and 1 doc/localization PR — you're riding 63k-star tldr and 12k-star Cataclysm-DDA coattails to inflate your impact with almost no core engineering. |
| Community influence | 3.9/8 | 3 followers, 0 following — you have fewer followers than trivial PRs in your recent sample, and you don't even follow anyone, just drop water PRs and ghost. |
| Activity authenticity | 12.7/17 | 97 contributions last year, active across 5 calendar years, last activity today — you're reliably active, but all that energy is funneled into outsourced PRs instead of your own starless repos. |
Red flags
- ~90% of your all-time popular-repo contributions target MinersStudios organization repos with only 1-3 stars each, so your "external impact" is almost entirely concentrated on a low-star org's projects with no verified core engineering work.
- Your high-star ecosystem impact is almost entirely documentation and localization work (a tldr test page edit, Ukrainian translations for MineOS) rather than core engineering, meaning your star count is massively inflated relative to actual code contribution depth.
- You have 11 self-closed external PRs and 8 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs alongside 38 merged PRs, meaning nearly half your PRs never get merged, and you often abandon or walk back your external work before it's accepted.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already prices in your starless home turf, docs-heavy external work, and high PR closure rate.
Verdict Normal, but aggressively unremarkable. You're a reliable water-PR dispenser for other people's projects, with zero star power on your own turf and no core engineering to make your high-star impact claims stick. No fraud red flags, but also nothing worth writing home about.