ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity9.3 / 10
Original project quality5.2 / 18
Contribution quality24.1 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact18.7 / 20
Community influence3.9 / 8
Activity authenticity12.8 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Shell31%
TypeScript20%
Rust19%
Go18%
Vue8%
HTML4%

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 Your original repos top out at 4 stars, your GitHub highlights are doc patches and CI tweaks for 100k-star projects — the open-source gig worker mask slips right off

zakobakasen — 74.00/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: A reliable external contributor who ships real code and docs to top-tier open-source repos, but his 30-repo personal portfolio is so starved it reads like a learning scratchpad he never bothered to polish.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity9.3/10Registered 5.39 years ago, contributions span 6 calendar years — no time-travel tricks, just consistent activity across the account's lifetime.
Original project quality5.2/1830 original repos (29 non-empty, 9 forks) with a total of 18 stars, top repo is a 4-star Bash notebook — his home turf is a personal script dump, not a portfolio of shippable projects.
Contribution quality24.1/2772 merged PRs out of 82 total, only 2 maintainer-closed unmerged (3% rejection rate), 4 self-closed external PRs and 1 self-closed own-repo PR — no PR spam, and recent samples show real code and doc work, not drive-by fixes.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact18.7/20All-time 8 PRs and 9 commits into 6 popular repos, including Xray-core (40k stars) and HowToCook (100k stars); verified samples include 2 core code PRs to Xray-core and 2 recipe/doc contributions to HowToCook, with 4 additional popular-repo contributions outside the sample.
Community influence3.9/816 followers, 11 following — a modest social footprint with zero follower-farming energy, just a quiet contributor who shows up to work and leaves.
Activity authenticity12.8/1737 contributions last year, active across 6 calendar years, last activity 0 days ago — consistent, real activity with no bot-like spikes or unexplained dormancy.
Red flags
None detected. No trivial PR farming, templated PR flooding, bot-like activity patterns, or maintainer-rejected PR clusters found. No star inflation or fake contribution signals present.
Score calibration
No extra adjustment. The base score correctly weights his low-star original project portfolio, mixed core and documentation external contributions, and consistent activity without any farming or inauthentic signals.
Verdict
Normal, solid open-source contributor. He reliably ships real changes to top-tier projects and avoids PR spam, but his personal project lineup is so low-stakes it looks like a GitHub learning journal he never bothered to turn into a portfolio.