🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Your personal project Dissent snagged 1,800+ stars, you land PRs in golang/go and TinyGo, yet your three school ACM attributed repos only pulled 6 stars total — your "server maid" title rings louder t
diamondburned — 96.90/100 · GOD (Legendary · Hall of Fame)
TL;DR: A legitimate open source heavyweight with a portfolio most contributors can only dream of, whose only cringe is a trio of campus ACM repos that can't even crack 10 stars combined.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 11.88 years, with contributions spanning 13 calendar years — this account has been shipping production code longer than many junior devs have been writing "hello world". |
| Original project quality | 17.7/18 | 141 original repos, 3,741 total stars, with flagship projects dissent (1,814 stars, actively maintained native Discord client), gotk4 (683 stars, Go GTK4 bindings), and arikawa (593 stars, Discord API library) all boasting strong community adoption and deep documentation. |
| Contribution quality | 27/27 | 240 merged PRs out of 332 total, with only a 12% maintainer-closed unmerged rate; recent samples show only 2 trivial external PRs, no templated PR flooding, and the vast majority of work targets real code rather than docs/site/CSS fluff. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 62 PRs + 631 commits into popular repos (all-time), including first-class contributions to golang/go, caddyserver/caddy, NixOS/nixpkgs, tinygo-org/tinygo, and LemmyNet/lemmy — verified samples confirm these are substantive code changes, not big-project window dressing. |
| Community influence | 7.3/8 | 682 followers, 106 following — a healthy 6.4:1 ratio that reflects genuine community respect, not follow-farming simp energy. |
| Activity authenticity | 14.9/17 | 273 contributions in the last year, active as of today, with work spread across personal projects, ecosystem maintenance, and external PRs — zero signs of botting or artificial activity inflation. |
Red flags None identified — all checked signals (PR rejection rate, trivial PR share, templated PR ratio, star inflation risk) are well within healthy ranges.
Score calibration No extra adjustment — the base score already priced in all observable signals, from flagship original projects to cross-ecosystem contributions. The only thing keeping this from a perfect 100 is that trio of campus ACM repos that can't even hit 10 stars combined.
Verdict Prioritize for any open source collaboration, maintainer access, or hiring consideration — this is a proven, high-value contributor who ships real, maintained code, not GitHub resume theater.