ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality17.4 / 18
Contribution quality27.0 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact20.0 / 20
Community influence7.4 / 8
Activity authenticity15.1 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Lua92%
Python3%
Tree-sitter Query2%
Makefile0%
Shell0%
Vue0%
Domains
neovimneovim-pluginnvimnvim-pluginlspnavigationoutlinepypipythonarduino-idevimvim-arduino

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 15 years of unbroken, high-quality OSS work, 3 legendary Neovim plugins, upstream Neovim commits, and a 167:1 follower-to-following ratio that screams "I build tools people use, not a resume cover."

stevearc — 96.90/100 · GOD (Legendary · Hall of Fame)

TL;DR: A 15-year OSS lifer with three Neovim essential plugins, upstream Neovim contributions, and a follower ratio that makes follow-farming bots look like clowns — no farming, no fluff, just real engineering that people actually use.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/1015.58 years on GitHub, 17 years of active contributions, last activity 28 days ago — this isn't a new account riding a Neovim hype wave, this is a long-term operator who built the wave.
Original project quality17.4/1856 original repos, 21,754 total stars, top three are production-grade Neovim plugins (oil.nvim 6.7k ★, conform.nvim 5.2k ★, aerial.nvim 2.3k ★) with no profile/config repo padding — the only missing points are because he hasn't made a 10k-star plugin yet, apparently.
Contribution quality27/27158 merged PRs out of 184 total, 5% maintainer rejection rate, only 6 trivial PRs in the recent 50-PR sample — even his rare rejected PRs are substantive, and his self-closed PRs are him tidying his own work, not farming failures.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact20/20120 PRs + 2,158 commits across 29 popular repos including neovim/neovim, with a verified sample showing 43 core engineering PRs to 29 doc-like ones — this isn't window dressing on big projects, this is actual upstream maintenance work that moves the ecosystem forward.
Community influence7.4/8836 followers, only 5 accounts followed — a 167:1 follower ratio that makes follow-farming scam accounts look like amateur hour.
Activity authenticity15.1/17338 contributions last year, 4 distinct activity types, 17 active contribution years, zero templated PR flooding or star inflation — his activity graph is a straight line of actual work, not a spike of farmed commits.

Red flags None. No trivial PR farming, no empty repo padding, no star inflation, no self-promotional spam — this account is clean, and honestly sets a bar most OSS profiles can't clear.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already fully captures his 15+ years of sustained high-quality work, upstream Neovim contributions, and complete lack of farming or low-quality patterns, so no bump or haircut was applied.

Verdict Normal high-caliber OSS contributor. No manual review needed — this is the gold standard other accounts should be measured against.