ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity8.8 / 10
Original project quality5.7 / 18
Contribution quality17.4 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact18.2 / 20
Community influence1.7 / 8
Activity authenticity9.9 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
C95%
Python3%
Assembly1%
Makefile1%
Perl0%
Shell0%

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 Following 21 accounts for only 2 followers, 10 original repos with a combined 1 star, padding your profile with typo fixes and config tweaks on 15k-star projects, 47 days of inactivity and still stuck

ZhanYF — 61.70/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: A low-profile contributor whose handful of legitimate high-star PRs can't hide a barren home repo portfolio and a follow-simp ratio that prioritizes visibility over actual output.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity8.8/10~5 years old account with 6 active contribution years, though 47 days of radio silence suggests your open-source habit runs on a battery that's constantly dying
Original project quality5.7/1810 original repos, 1 combined star, only veritymobile (quality score 0.8) has any real content; the rest are config dumps, personal bookmarks, or digital dead weight
Contribution quality17.4/2715 of 17 PRs merged, with 1 maintainer-closed unmerged PR and 1 self-closed external PR; 6 recent merged PRs are trivial fixes, 54% of external PRs orbit docs/site/config tweaks, so your review queue luck is better than your PR substance
Ecosystem / maintenance impact18.2/207 PRs and 9 commits across 6 popular repos totaling ~48k stars, with 3 verified core code contributions to seL4, capnproto and evremap — this is the only part of your profile that doesn't look like resume padding
Community influence1.7/82 followers, 21 following, a 10.5:1 follow-to-follower ratio that makes your influence smaller than the typo you fixed in DearPyGui's demo script
Activity authenticity9.9/17Only 6 contributions all last year, 3 activity types total, and 47 days of no recent commits — your open-source presence is sparser than your repo star counts
Red flags
  1. Your 10 original repos have a combined 1 star, with only veritymobile containing meaningful content; the rest are config dumps, personal bookmarks, or empty shells.
  2. 54% of your recent external PRs are docs/site/examples/config tweaks rather than core engineering work, and 6 of your 15 recent merged PRs are trivial fixes (typos, broken links, config updates) on high-star projects.
  3. You follow 21 accounts but have only 2 followers, a 10.5:1 ratio that signals you're curating other people's work far more than building your own audience.
  4. 47 days with no recent contributions, and only 6 total contributions in the last year, makes your active contributor status feel performative at best. Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your sparse home turf, docs-heavy external PRs, and low community footprint, with no positive bump for your top original repo since its 1 star reflects almost no real user adoption. Verdict Normal average contributor with a handful of legitimate high-star PRs, but no meaningful personal project footprint to back up your GitHub presence — you're the open-source temp worker who shows up for small tasks at big companies but has no office of your own.