ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality4.2 / 18
Contribution quality26.6 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.3 / 20
Community influence6.5 / 8
Activity authenticity16.4 / 17

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 Your bio is packed with Apache PMC/Committer credentials, but your 11 original repos have just 11 total stars and a top repo quality score of 0.19 — you’ve shipped 379 merged PRs and 500 commits to ot

wgtmac — 83.00/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)

TL;DR: Legit high-impact Apache big data core contributor with 379 merged PRs and 500 commits to top-tier ecosystem projects, but his own repo portfolio is a barren wasteland with just 11 total stars across all original work.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/1013 years old, 14 active contribution years, last activity today
Original project quality4.2/1811 original repos with just 11 total stars; top-starred original repo (JSVM-Code-Notes) has a project quality score of 0.19, and his highest-rated original repo (millionaire) has 0 stars
Contribution quality26.6/27379 merged PRs out of 530 total; 28 maintainer-closed unmerged, 42 self-closed external PRs, 30 self-closed own-repo PRs; only 14% of recent merged PRs target docs/site/examples/CSS, with just 4 external trivial PRs
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.3/20397 PRs + 500 commits into 13 popular repos (including Apache Arrow, Iceberg, Parquet, Avro, Spark); 73 of the 83 verified file-level impact samples are core engineering changes, not docs/site work
Community influence6.5/8196 followers, 95 following, no star inflation signals
Activity authenticity16.4/171167 contributions last year, active across 4 activity types, no templated PR flood or PR spam indicators

Red flags None detected. No PR spam, star inflation, templated flooding, or high rejection signals appear in the data.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for the low star value of his original repos, low docs/site/examples contribution share, and strong verified core engineering impact across Apache ecosystems.

Verdict Normal high-value contributor. His 379 merged PRs and 500 commits to Apache Arrow, Iceberg, Parquet, Avro and Spark are legit core engineering work with a low 7% maintainer rejection rate, but his GitHub is an external impact résumé, not a homegrown project portfolio — his 11 original repos have a combined 11 stars, so don’t look for original hit projects under his name.