Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 13 years on GitHub, 37 repos all with zero stars, your entire profile is propped up by submitting core PRs to other people's bioinformatics projects — your own repos are a digital ghost town, and you'
votti — 70.20/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Solid contributor with strong substantive external contributions to popular open-source bioinformatics and tooling projects, though all personal repositories are low-star demos with no standalone user value.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 13.32 years, active across 14 contribution years |
| Original project quality | 4.7/18 | Total stars 0, max stars 0; all 10 original repos are demos/explorations with no user adoption, top original repo quality score 0 |
| Contribution quality | 24.2/27 | 117 merged PRs, 146 total PRs; 12 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 3 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 14.6/20 | 11 substantive core PRs/commits into ★… repos (all-time, including snakemake (2819★), kubeflow/pipelines (4158★), RPi-Jukebox-RFID (1750★), CellProfiler (1120★), ilastik (400★)); no own popular projects with stars |
| Community influence | 5.1/8 | 23 followers |
| Activity authenticity | 11.6/17 | 130 contributions in the last year, last activity 169 days ago |
Red flags: None Manual adjustment: None (0) — no missed signals warrant score change: external contributions are substantive core work, no farming behavior detected, low original project quality is already fully reflected in the original project quality sub-score. Verdict: Normal, reliable external contributor; personal projects are low-value demos but no malicious or low-quality farming behavior is present.