ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality9.6 / 18
Contribution quality21.9 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.9 / 20
Community influence4.3 / 8
Activity authenticity17.0 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
TypeScript86%
Shell12%
JavaScript2%
Domains
androidandroid-aria2aria2aria2-termuxawesome-termuxtermux-tools

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 6-year GitHub account whose original stars come entirely from Termux scripts and niche pi extensions, nearly half of external PRs are doc/config tweaks to farm contribution counts, and 31 followers is

RimuruW — 76.70/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: Solid long-term contributor with genuine original projects, but external work is almost entirely docs/config window-dressing on popular repos, and the 31-follower clout is a sad flex.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 6.52 years, active across 8 contribution years with last activity 1 day ago — your account is older than most junior devs' careers, yet you only have 31 followers to show for it.
Original project quality9.6/1821 original repos net 315 total stars, with your most popular projects being a Termux Aria2 install script (193 stars) and a niche pi line-editing extension (102 stars) — your home turf is a quiet cul-de-sac, not a developer downtown.
Contribution quality21.9/2743 merged PRs out of 51 total with a 2% maintainer rejection rate, but 4 external PRs were closed by you before merging — you'd rather ghost your own half-finished contributions than get a formal rejection.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.9/20All-time total of 37 contributions to popular repos (5 PRs + 32 commits), with 30 of those commits going to a single Android module repo — your ecosystem footprint is a deep dive into one niche, not a broad, impactful spread.
Community influence4.3/831 followers against 20 following — your influence is so small you're practically running a one-person fan club.
Activity authenticity17/172525 contributions last year across 4 activity types, with activity spanning 8 years — your output volume is legit, even if nearly half of your external contributions are docs/config tweaks to pad the count.

Red flags

  • External contributions to popular repositories are overwhelmingly documentation, configuration, or template changes rather than core engineering work, so your "ecosystem impact" is mostly window-dressing on other people's projects.
  • The FixChinaCarrier repository has 30 all-time commits but 0 listed PRs in the impact summary, which points to either direct push access or a data categorization gap — not malicious, but a minor inconsistency worth noting.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your solid original project work, low PR rejection rate, and the docs-heavy nature of your external contributions.

Verdict Normal solid contributor with genuine original projects and consistent activity, but don't posture as a core open-source engineer — your external work is mostly polishing other people's docs, and your 31-follower clout is a sad flex.