← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…
Score breakdown
Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality9.1 / 18
Contribution quality18.6 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact17.6 / 20
Community influence4.1 / 8
Activity authenticity13.4 / 17
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 6.5-year GitHub veteran with just 119 followers but 416 follows, your highest-starred personal repo is 33 stars, and you bulk-reproduce bugs for zkbugs to pad your contribution graph — you're a reliab
ret2basic — 72.80/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: A diligent Web3 security researcher with substantive, non-trivial contributions to popular zero-knowledge audit repositories, but low traction on personal study projects and a following count that far outpaces their follower base.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | registered 6.49 yrs, active 8 yrs |
| Original project quality | 9.1/18 | total stars 95, max stars 33 across 73 original repos (42 non-empty) |
| Contribution quality | 18.6/27 | merged PRs 72, total PRs 111; maintainer-closed unmerged 6, author-closed external PRs 26, author-closed own-repo PRs 0 |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 17.6/20 | 52 substantive PRs/commits into ★13389 (GTFOBins.github.io) and other popular repos (incl. zksecurity/zkbugs, WTF-zk; all-time, see impact_repos) |
| Community influence | 4.1/8 | followers 119, following 416 |
| Activity authenticity | 13.4/17 | last-year contributions 198, active across 8 contribution years, 0 days since last activity |
Red flags: None Manual adjustment: None (0) Verdict: Normal, recommended for Web3 security audit collaboration