Anonymous73.9分就混成人上人，卷还是你会卷啊
Anonymous73.9 and 'upper class' tier? That's a major flex.
AnonymousPR定点户+文档润色匠，NotionNext常客乙方？
AnonymousPR hunter + doc polisher, regular NotionNext gig worker.
Anonymous代表作栏空但等级人上人，潜力股实锤了
AnonymousNo featured repos but top tier? True hidden gem.
Anonymousqianzhu/Lucien这别名，中二感和实力各占一半？
AnonymousEmpty bio but stacked stats, dev enigma we can't crack.
← Back to Hall of Fame
🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
Account maturity4.9 / 10
Original project quality6.9 / 18
Contribution quality22.8 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.8 / 20
Community influence3.7 / 8
Activity authenticity15.8 / 17
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
Top languages
JavaScript92%
TypeScript3%
Python2%
HTML2%
CSS1%
Shell0%
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 1.6-year-old account with 13 followers, 21 total stars across 41 original repos, 60% of external PRs locked onto NotionNext, all personal projects are zero-star tiny toys: solid gig worker, but your G
qianzhu18 — 73.90/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Reliable external contributor to high-star open-source projects, but your 41 original repos have only 21 total stars and 13 followers — your GitHub presence is a part-time résumé, not a standalone engineering portfolio.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 4.9/10 | Registered 1.63 years, active across 3 contribution years. You've been on GitHub longer than most side projects last, yet your follower count is still lower than the number of repos you've forked — at least you're not a dormant account, even if your home turf is still a construction site. |
| Original project quality | 6.9/18 | 41 original repos, 21 total stars, top repo wx-summary-skill has 7 stars and a 0.7 quality score (personal learning tool, not broadly usable). 41 original repos, only 21 total stars, your "best" project is a 7-star personal WeChat summary skill — your project garden grows mostly weeds, not fruit anyone wants to pick. |
| Contribution quality | 22.8/27 | 60 merged PRs out of 75 total, 4 maintainer-closed unmerged, 1 self-closed external PR, 1 self-closed own-repo PR, 6% rejection rate. 75 total PRs, 60 merged, only 4 bounced by maintainers — your external PRs are mostly welcome, but 60% of them are concentrated on NotionNext, like you're that one regular who only orders the same coffee every day and never tries the menu. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 19.8/20 | 35 PRs + 27 commits into repos with a combined ~195k stars (all-time, verified file samples are a subset, not the total). 62 all-time contributions to high-star repos including bytedance/deer-flow, anthropics/claude-cookbooks, and google-gemini/cookbook — you're a solid gig worker for the big projects, even if you don't get credit for the stars they already have. |
| Community influence | 3.7/8 | 13 followers, 10 following. 13 followers, barely more than the number of repos you've forked — your community influence is basically just the maintainers who merge your PRs, no one's here for your personal brand. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.8/17 | 664 contributions last year, last active today. 664 contributions last year, no dormant gaps, no bot signals — your activity is real, even if most of it is either PRs to NotionNext or tinkering with your own zero-star side projects. |
| Red flags |
- Extreme concentration of external contributions on notionnext-org/NotionNext (60% share): you're essentially a part-time contributor for a single project instead of spreading your work across the ecosystem, which makes your impact feel narrow even if the PRs are good.
- Multiple very large churn PRs to your own repos (e.g. 319,995 churn on an ObsidianToMP PR, 197,022 churn on another ObsidianToMP PR, 112k+ churn on multiple ObsidianToMP PRs): these look like AI-assisted bulk pushes rather than incremental, reviewable development, even if they don't violate farming rules.
- Near-total lack of traction on your original projects: 21 total stars across 41 original repos, no repo breaks 7 stars — your personal project portfolio has almost no public value, so your entire GitHub worth is tied to other people's projects. Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your strong external contributions, weak personal project traction, and lack of bot or farming signals. Verdict Normal, low-risk contributor. Your external work is legitimate and useful, but your near-barren home turf means you're a reliable open-source gig worker, not a standalone engineering presence worth following for your own projects.