ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality13.4 / 18
Contribution quality26.2 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.9 / 20
Community influence4.4 / 8
Activity authenticity17.0 / 17

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 584 of your 679 impact PRs are templated version bumps for a single package repo — your GOD tier is just a very long changelog of other people's software.

pl4nty — 89.90/100 · GOD (Legendary · Hall of Fame)

TL;DR: High-volume contributor with strong substantive work on cloud-native and Windows tooling, but a large majority of their public PR footprint is low-effort templated version bumps for package manifest repos, dragging down impact quality despite impressive raw numbers.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 9.86 years, active across 11 contribution years
Original project quality13.4/1836 non-empty original repos, 538 total stars, top project cloudflare-kubernetes-gateway (310 ★), no star inflation detected
Contribution quality26.2/27871 merged / 1037 total PRs; 21 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 56 author-closed external PRs, 23 author-closed own-repo PRs, 2% maintainer rejection rate, only 1 trivial PR in recent 50-PR sample
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.9/20679 substantive PRs/commits into popular repos (incl. 584 PRs to microsoft/winget-pkgs, 8 commits to 84k ★ Stirling-PDF, PRs to PowerShell, refined-github, winget-cli, and Signal-Desktop; all-time impact across 52 repos)
Community influence4.4/8174 followers, 582 following, low follower growth relative to activity volume
Activity authenticity17/173093 contributions in the last year, 0 days since last activity, 4 distinct activity types tracked, consistent long-term engagement
Red flags: None
Manual adjustment: -1 (Large majority of all-time impact PRs are low-effort templated version bumps for the microsoft/winget-pkgs package manifest repo, representing minimal substantive contribution relative to raw PR count)
Verdict: Normal (high-volume contributor with niche package management and cloud-native expertise, no malicious signals detected, suitable for standard trust assessment)