Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
pavelc4 — 60.10/100 · NPC (普通账号·特征平庸存疑)
TL;DR: Genuine, highly active open source contributor with no red flags, but limited external impact due to small project scale and low public reach.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 8.4/10 | Registered ~4.6 years, active across 6 contribution years |
| Original project quality | 7.8/18 | Total stars 43, top starred repo auriya with 22 ★ |
| Contribution quality | 19.8/27 | 39 merged PRs out of 41 total, 5% rejection rate, 0 trivial external PRs |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 0/20 | Merged substantive PRs into external repos including Gustyx-Power/Xtra-Kernel-Manager (53 ★) and Rve27/RvSystem-Monitor (51 ★), though script did not credit these small-repo contributions |
| Community influence | 5.1/8 | 24 followers, following 10, healthy 2.4:1 follower ratio |
| Activity authenticity | 17/17 | 2383 contributions last year, 0 days since last activity, no signs of spam or automation |
Red flags: None Manual adjustment: +2, as the script undercounted ecosystem impact by failing to credit substantive PRs merged into small but legitimate external repositories where the user made meaningful feature and bug fix contributions. Verdict: Normal, recommend normal engagement.
🔥 Roast: You’ve logged 2383 contributions last year and kept your PR rejection rate to a low 5%, but your total star count is a meager 43 and your most popular repo only has 22 stars — your code is actually decent, but your self-promotion skills are so weak you can’t even get your own projects to gather traction, and you clearly spend half your GitHub time merging your own dev branches like it’s a competitive sport.