🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
a cli system trash manager, alternative to rm and trash-cli
RustA language server for lua written in rust
RustMake neovim the best note taking application
Lualua wrapper for neovim terminal
LuaSets the working directory of neovim based on nvim-lspconfig
Lua🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Spent ages hunting for flaws, and the only one I found is your top-starred original repo is literally named 'trashy' — your best home project is self-deprecating, and 62 followers are way too low for
oberblastmeister — 90.20/100 · GOD (Legendary · Hall of Fame)
TL;DR: A genuine core-code contributor shipping real features to top-tier editor and language tooling projects, with solid original Rust/Lua tooling to his name — the only joke is his 62-follower fan club for a guy with 121 PRs into 100k-star repos.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 6.37 years, active across 7 contribution years, last activity 5 days ago — this isn't a fresh account farming Hacktoberfest badges. |
| Original project quality | 14.1/18 | 1,045 total stars across 82 original repos, led by trashy (523 stars, 0.85 quality score) and lua-analyzer (0.95 quality score, 68 stars) — solid home-grown tooling, just not viral breakout hits. |
| Contribution quality | 27/27 | 161 merged out of 229 total PRs, with only 18 maintainer-closed unmerged (10% rejection rate) — no PR drive-by or spam signals, just consistent, accepted shipping. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 121 PRs and 124 commits spread across 29 popular repos, including core LSP contributions to Neovim (100k stars), Zed (86k), Helix (45k), and Sorbet — this is actual engine work, not big-project window dressing. |
| Community influence | 5.7/8 | 62 followers vs 12 following — a healthy ratio, but shockingly low for someone shipping core features to 100k-star editor projects; your fan club is clearly missing the memo. |
| Activity authenticity | 13.4/17 | 193 contributions in the last year, active across 7 full years, last activity 5 days ago — consistent, real work, no bot-like spike patterns or contribution faking. |
Red flags None — no trivial PR farming, no templated bulk submissions, no fork hoarding, no star inflation signals. All PRs are substantive, no suspicious patterns detected.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects the strong core contribution footprint, high-quality original projects, and clean PR history; no qualitative signals were missed that would warrant a bump or haircut.
Verdict Normal, high-trust contributor with a proven track record of real core engineering work across the editor and language tooling ecosystem. No concerns, just a weirdly undersized follower count for the caliber of code being shipped.