Anonymous书单暴君实锤 星比我的年收入还高
AnonymousHis free book repo has 117k stars? Mad respect
Anonymous90分夯？这简历镀的是金箔吧
Anonymous90 tier with 'Resume Gilder' tag? I'm shook
Anonymous他那个CDN替换工具当年装机必备啊
AnonymousThat WeChat mini-program repo saved me so much time
Anonymous文档狂魔+生态影帝 标签直接叠满
AnonymousVSCode Deno plugin creator and Deno contributor? Chef's kiss
← Back to Hall of Fame
Score breakdown
Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality12.4 / 18
Contribution quality26.9 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact20.0 / 20
Community influence8.0 / 8
Activity authenticity15.7 / 17
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
free-programming-books-zh_CN⭐ 117.2K
:books: 免费的计算机编程类中文书籍，欢迎投稿
awesome-wechat-weapp⭐ 51.2K
微信小程序开发资源汇总 :100:
TypeScriptReplaceGoogleCDN⭐ 3.7K
⚡️ 一个 Chrome 插件：将 Google CDN 替换为国内的。
JavaScriptGoogle-IPs⭐ 3.5K
:us: Google 全球 IP 地址库
TypeScriptali-words⭐ 967
互联网黑话词汇表，包含“赋能、抓手、闭环、沉淀、打通”等阿里味儿词汇
TypeScriptopenai-proxy⭐ 944
OpenAI/ChatGPT 免翻墙代理
JavaScript🧬 Stack & domains
Top languages
JavaScript32%
TypeScript30%
Shell16%
HTML14%
Python5%
CSS2%
Domains
javascriptchrome-extensiongoogleandroidangularbooksfreeioskotlinpdfprogrammingpython
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Rides a 117k-star book index as your flagship impact claim, 70% of recent PRs are docs/CI polish on your own 1-star MoonBit toys, and all 128 claimed popular-repo contributions have zero file-level ve
justjavac — 90.00/100 · GOD (Legendary · Hall of Fame)
TL;DR: A legendary-tier account whose score was trimmed for unverified ecosystem impact claims and a home turf dominated by curated lists and docs polish rather than core engineering — impressive on paper, hollow under audit.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 15.88 years, active across 17 contribution years with activity as recent as today — no complaints about tenure here. |
| Original project quality | 12.4/18 | 138 original repos with 184,110 total stars, but the top-starred original repo is a 117,204-star Chinese programming book list (quality score 0.64) rather than a usable software project, with only the 3,659-star ReplaceGoogleCDN Chrome extension as a genuine code artifact. |
| Contribution quality | 26.9/27 | 1,324 merged PRs out of 1,409 total, a 2% maintainer rejection rate, 37 author-closed external PRs, and 14 author-closed own-repo PRs — but the recent merged sample is 70% docs/CI/metadata changes, with only 2 trivial external PRs (a broken repo link fix and a 1-file Windows error decode). |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 128 PRs + 225 commits across 53 popular repos (all-time total), but zero of these contributions have file-level verification, and the impact list includes your own 117k-star book list, inflating your ecosystem impact with personal content popularity rather than engineering work. |
| Community influence | 8/8 | 17,212 followers vs 88 following — an influencer-worthy ratio, but most of those followers are there for your book list, not your code. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.7/17 | 1,758 contributions last year, but the recent PR sample is overwhelmingly low-star own-repo docs/CI polish, with no substantive external core contributions to speak of. |
| Red flags |
- All 128 claimed all-time popular-repo contributions lack file-level verification: there is no evidence these PRs modified core code rather than docs, site assets, or templates.
- Your highest-starred original repository is a curated Chinese programming book list, not a usable software project, so your original project star count is heavily inflated by content curation rather than engineering output.
- Your recent merged PR sample (50 PRs) is 70% documentation, CI configuration, and metadata changes targeted at your own low-star repositories, with only 2 trivial external PRs (a broken repository link fix and a 1-file Windows error decoding change).
- Your all-time popular-repo impact list includes your own 117k-star book list, conflating personal content popularity with actual ecosystem engineering contribution.
- The split between core engineering and documentation/CI work for your claimed 128 popular-repo contributions is completely unknown, so there is no way to confirm how much of that impact is substantive. Score calibration A -3 adjustment was applied to reflect the unverified all-time popular-repo contributions, the inflation of your original project quality from a star-heavy book list rather than usable software, and the recent PR sample's heavy bias toward docs/CI polish on low-star personal repositories. No other adjustments were made. Verdict Needs human review — the raw metrics look Hall of Fame worthy on paper, but the verification gaps and contribution composition mean you cannot take the score at face value without manually confirming whether those 128 claimed popular-repo PRs are actual core engineering contributions or more window dressing on high-star projects.