ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity9.7 / 10
Original project quality8.3 / 18
Contribution quality24.3 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.5 / 20
Community influence3.5 / 8
Activity authenticity16.6 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
TypeScript40%
Vue24%
Rust18%
Python12%
Scala3%
CSS1%
Domains
configgithub-config

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 Churning out 99 merged PRs and a core linter rule for the 21k-star oxc project, yet your 25 original repos have only 8 total stars and 9 followers, with your top repo at 3 stars. You're the open-sourc

Honahec — 75.90/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: A reliably productive open-source contributor with a legit core engineering win under his belt, but his personal project portfolio is so starved it reads like a resume with no relevant experience to back up his output volume.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity9.7/10Registered 5.77 years ago, active across 7 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago. Nearly 6 years of consistent presence, but all that time hasn't been enough to crack 10 total stars across his entire original project lineup.
Original project quality8.3/1825 original repos, 8 total stars, top repo s3-signer has 3 stars and a 0.95 quality score. Even his highest-quality original project can't hit double-digit stars, so his personal portfolio contributes almost nothing to his overall score.
Contribution quality24.3/2799 merged PRs out of 101 total, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 1 self-closed external PR, 0 recent trivial PRs, 0 recent doc-like external PRs. Near-perfect merge rate with no rejections and almost no low-quality work, this is the strongest part of his profile.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.5/20All-time 7 PRs and 6 commits across 3 popular repos (13 total contributions), verified sample includes a core linter rule for the 21k-star oxc project plus docs/site patches for smaller popular repos. That single oxc rule is the only high-impact core contribution in his entire popular-repo history, with the rest orbiting docs and site work.
Community influence3.5/89 followers, follows 5 accounts. His follower count is barely higher than the number of accounts he follows, a clear sign his work hasn't broken out of niche project circles.
Activity authenticity16.6/171392 contributions last year, active across 4 activity types, last activity 0 days ago, 0 PR flood suspicion, 3% templated PR ratio. No signs of botting, spam, or templated PR farming — his activity is genuine and high-volume.

Red flags

  • 3 of his all-time popular-repo contributions lack file-level quality samples for review, but this is a data coverage limitation and not a negative quality signal.
  • His follower count is extremely low relative to his total contribution volume, but there are no indicators of inauthentic activity (such as botting or follow-farming) tied to this gap.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already captures his strong contribution quality, single high-impact core engineering PR, and underperforming personal project portfolio.

Verdict Normal, trustworthy contributor with a proven track record of shipping accepted, non-trivial code across both his own projects and external popular repositories, with no red flags for inauthentic activity or contribution farming.