ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality6.6 / 18
Contribution quality25.6 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.4 / 20
Community influence3.7 / 8
Activity authenticity15.1 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Elixir90%
JavaScript3%
Shell2%
Emacs Lisp1%
HTML1%
CSS1%
Domains
ai-agentsazure-devopsburritoclidevopselixirllmoauth

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 10-year GitHub veteran with 487 merged PRs all funneled into other people's repos, 177 forks vs 23 original projects that have a combined 7 stars, a home turf so barren it can't grow a single star, an

gilbertwong96 — 80.40/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)

TL;DR: Decade-long GitHub contributor with 487 merged PRs to high-profile open-source projects, but his own 23 original repos are so starved they only have 7 stars combined — his entire profile is a contract worker's resume for open source.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 9.96 years, active across 11 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — can't argue with a decade of consistent presence.
Original project quality6.6/1823 original repos with 7 total stars, top repo maxes at 3 stars — even his most fleshed-out Elixir SDKs (longbridge, ado_cli) haven't earned a single community star, and his highest-rated original repo is a tiny Erlang base62 encoder.
Contribution quality25.6/27487 merged PRs out of 595 total, 28 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (5% rejection rate), 43 author-closed external PRs he abandoned mid-work, 1 self-closed own-repo PR — low rejection rate is solid, but he has a habit of ditching his own external PRs before they're merged.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.4/2067 PRs + 43 commits into repos with up to 47k stars (tmux, elixir, phoenix, erlang/otp, doomemacs) all-time — he has more commits to other people's flagship projects than to his own.
Community influence3.7/860 followers, 163 following — he follows 2.7x more people than follow him, a clear sign his contributions haven't built a personal audience.
Activity authenticity15.1/17930 contributions last year, active across 3 activity types, 0 days since last activity — no ghosting, he actually shows up to contribute regularly.

Red flags

  • No file-level quality samples are available for any of his 67 all-time contributions to high-profile popular repos, so we can't confirm whether his work to projects like tmux or elixir touches core code or just docs/site/frontend touch-ups.
  • His 23 original repos have a combined 7 stars total, with zero stars on his two largest, most actively maintained projects (longbridge, ado_cli) — his home turf has no community traction whatsoever.
  • The recent PR sample is empty, leaving us with no visibility into the nature of his contributions over the last year beyond raw contribution counts.
  • No verified core-impact PRs are recorded for his high-profile repo contributions, though this is likely a sample coverage gap rather than proof he only does low-impact work.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score of 80.4 already accounts for his strong all-time contribution track record and low 5% rejection rate, with no additional bump or haircut applied.

Verdict Normal. This is a reliable, active open-source contributor who ships real work to major projects, with no signs of PR farming or bad faith behavior — the only gap is that his own original projects haven't managed to earn a single star from the community.