Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 6+ years on GitHub with only 10 followers and 133 total stars? Your only claim to fame is 1 core PR to a 29.5k-star repo, while your other 4 PRs are either trivial go.sum fixes or self-merges in your
DouDOU-start — 65.20/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: Ships usable tools and has one solid external win, but his GitHub is 90% self-hosted script hoarding with zero community traction, a perfectly average open-source persona with no real footprint.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 6.73 years on GitHub, 8 years of active contribution, last activity 0 days ago — long enough tenure to have built a notable footprint, but settled for script hoarding instead. |
| Original project quality | 11.2/18 | 47 original repos, 133 total stars, top project is a ChatGPT registration deploy script with 55 stars — your entire original portfolio has fewer stars than a single viral TikTok, and your best work is a tool for mass-registering AI accounts. |
| Contribution quality | 13.3/27 | 5 total merged PRs, 0 maintainer-rejected PRs, 2 trivial recent PRs (a go.sum checksum fix and a YAML config edit) — your entire PR career is 5 merged commits, half of which are trivial self-serve fixes, with only one non-trivial external PR to show for 6+ years on GitHub. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 10.4/20 | 1 PR + 4 commits into the 29,520-star Wei-Shaw/sub2api repo (all-time) — your entire ecosystem impact boils down to 4 commits and 1 PR to a single external project, no sustained maintenance or cross-project contribution to speak of. |
| Community influence | 3.6/8 | 10 followers, 8 following — your follower count is lower than the number of repos you have forked, and you follow more people than follow you, a textbook open-source simp energy. |
| Activity authenticity | 16.7/17 | 1448 contributions last year, 4 activity types, 8 active contribution years — your contribution volume is real and consistent, but almost all of it is self-PR activity in your own 69 repos, not meaningful open-source collaboration. |
Red flags
- Almost no external contribution footprint: only 1 verified non-trivial PR to a popular repo across your entire 5-PR career, with the rest of your 1448 yearly contributions locked inside your own 69 repos.
- Multiple original projects are AI account registration/automation tools that may violate target platform terms of service, exposing users to account bans or legal risk.
Score calibration No extra adjustment — the base score already captures your minimal external footprint, low-star original portfolio, and self-serve contribution pattern, so no bump or haircut was needed.
Verdict Normal, unremarkable open-source contributor — you ship usable tools and have one legitimate external win, but your GitHub is a script hoard with no real community traction or standout impact, perfectly average in every way that matters.