Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 3.47 years on GitHub with only 2 followers and 1 follow, top original repo gets a meager 61 stars, 35+ of your 63 merged PRs are locked into the same 1212-star Stapxs-QQ-Lite-2.0 repo as a code monkey
Chzxxuanzheng — 71.20/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: A high-volume, low-drama contributor who ships accepted, substantive work into popular open-source projects, but can't grow a single meaningful star or follower under their own name — all labor, no personal brand.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 7/10 | Registered 3.5 years ago, active across 4 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — no ghost energy, just steady long-term presence. |
| Original project quality | 8/18 | 11 original repos, 77 total stars, top repo Stapxs-QQ-Lite-X has 61 stars and a 0.65 quality score — that's a usable redistribution of an existing project, not a breakout original hit, and the rest of your repos are mostly sub-10-star toys, configs, and personal doodles. |
| Contribution quality | 22.7/27 | 63 merged PRs out of 76 total, only 1 maintainer-closed unmerged PR, 11 self-closed external PRs, 1 self-closed own-repo PR — you don't waste maintainers' time, your work is almost universally accepted, and you clean up your own messes when you make them. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 14.6/20 | 52 PRs + 145 commits across 4 popular repos, headlined by 50 PRs and 141 commits into Stapxs-QQ-Lite-2.0 (1,212 stars), plus core contributions to LLOneBot/LuckyLilliaBot (3,393 stars) and nonebot/nonebot2 (7,590 stars) — this is sustained, substantive work on real, actively used projects, not resume-padding docs touch-ups. |
| Community influence | 3.7/8 | 2 followers, 1 following — your contribution output is exponentially larger than your audience, which means you're not here for clout, just to ship code. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.2/17 | 1,039 contributions last year, 3 distinct activity types, no bot or templated PR flood signals — this is a real person writing real code, not a script farming PRs for Hacktoberfest badges. |
Red flags None. No PR farming, no templated bulk contributions, no star inflation, no uncredited documentation work — this account's behavior is clean, if dramatically underfollowed for its output.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already captures your strong core contribution record to popular projects, low rejection rate, and clean activity signals, with no manual bump or haircut applied.
Verdict Normal, trustworthy contributor. You're not here to play GitHub influencer — you're here to do the work, and the data shows you do it well, even if your own repos haven't caught the same traction as the projects you pour your labor into.