ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity7.2 / 10
Original project quality13.9 / 18
Contribution quality26.4 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact17.7 / 20
Community influence6.7 / 8
Activity authenticity17.0 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Python54%
TypeScript22%
HTML9%
JavaScript7%
MDX4%
CSS3%
Domains
grokgrok-imaginefaster-whispergpt-4gpt-4ospeech-recognitionvideo-translationwhisperlinux-dowiki

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 Dumped 50 straight merged PRs into a single 642-star project while 3 of your 9 personal repos sit at zero stars — your Grok gateway may be popular, but your home repo portfolio is a wasteland with one

chenyme — 88.90/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)

TL;DR: High-volume full-stack contributor with a 5k-star Grok gateway and a 286-PR track record of accepted code, but half his personal repos are zero-star ghost towns — strong external work, barren home turf.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity7.2/10Registered 3.62 years, active across 5 contribution years, last activity 20 days ago — steady enough to not be a tourist, just oddly low-key for someone shipping this much code.
Original project quality13.9/18Total 8722 stars across original repos, led by the 5293-star grok2api (quality score 0.77), but 3 of 9 personal repos are zero-star empty shells — one hit project carrying the whole portfolio.
Contribution quality26.4/27286 merged PRs out of 291 total, only 2 maintainer rejections, zero trivial external PRs — his PRs actually get accepted, no Hacktoberfest badge farming here.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact17.7/20283 PRs + 2002 commits across 6 popular repos (max 5293 stars), 96 of 99 verified samples are core engineering, not docs/site/CSS window dressing — this is actual maintenance work, not resume polishing.
Community influence6.7/8278 followers, following just 1 account — no simp-style follow farming, his follower count is earned from actual shipped code, not follow-for-follow schemes.
Activity authenticity17/172199 contributions last year, zero star inflation or PR flood flags, templated PR ratio just 0.13 — no bot behavior, no AI ghostwriting spam, just a human who codes a lot.

Red flags

  • All 50 recent sampled merged PRs target the single DEEIX-AI/DEEIX-Chat project, despite all-time impact spanning 6 repos — recent contribution concentration is unusually lopsided.
  • 184 all-time popular-repo PRs lack file-level verification, though the 99 PR sample and 96 core-impact count support the overall quality assessment.
  • 3 of his 9 original repos sit at zero stars with no visible activity, making his home turf look like a ghost town compared to his external contribution footprint.

Score calibration No extra adjustment; the base score already priced in his strong grok2api project, 283 cross-repo PRs, and near-zero rejection rate.

Verdict Normal, high-trust contributor: his work is substantive, accepted, and spans multiple popular repos, with no signs of farming, bot behavior, or inflated metrics. The only oddity is his empty personal repo graveyard, which is a portfolio quirk, not a trust issue.