🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 6 years on GitHub, 10 total stars, a profile repo with zero stars and nothing but links, and all your "impact" is PR tourism in anticheat/cheat mod ecosystems — your open-source resume is thinner than
zyklone4096 — 65.20/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A 6-year GitHub account with only 10 total stars, whose only credible impact is PR tourism in niche anticheat/cheat mod ecosystems, and a home turf full of empty repos and a link-only profile page with zero stars.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 6.26 years, active across 7 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — old enough to have built a credible portfolio, but settled for GitHub resume padding instead. |
| Original project quality | 5.6/18 | Total stars across all original repos: 10. Top repo HomoAC has 6 stars and a quality score of 0.6, while the remaining 25 repos are mostly empty mod config dumps, unused tools, or a link-only profile repo with zero stars. |
| Contribution quality | 19.5/27 | 24 merged PRs out of 28 total, only 1 maintainer-closed unmerged PR, 3 author-closed external PRs. 5 of 24 merged PRs are trivial, 7 are doc/site/examples touch-ups (including own repos), with recent external doc-like PR ratio at 0.23 — most external work is minor tweaks, not core engineering. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 14.2/20 | 7 PRs + 7 commits across 5 popular repos (all-time, max repo stars 3790 for TwitchDownloader). Verified sample shows 2 substantive PRs, with 5 more all-time popular-repo contributions lacking file-level samples — impact is real but narrow, mostly translation and niche mod tweaks. |
| Community influence | 4.1/8 | 23 followers, 15 following — a social footprint so small it can’t even fill a casual Discord call, no meaningful community reach to speak of. |
| Activity authenticity | 11.8/17 | 115 contributions last year, no flood/farming suspicion, templated PR ratio only 0.07 — activity is genuine, just not converting to stars, followers, or strong original work. |
Red flags
- A large share of high-impact contributions target the game anticheat/cheat modification niche; while sampled PRs show no malicious intent, this ecosystem often carries community-specific moderation and trust concerns.
- All 26 original repos combined hold only 10 total stars, with nearly all non-empty repos being niche mod tools, unused configs, or a link-only profile repo with zero stars and no original code.
- The account’s strongest original project (HomoAC, 6 stars) is a niche Minecraft anticheat tool with no broader adoption, and the profile repo exists solely to link to external platforms with no original content.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects the account’s thin original project footprint, narrow niche external impact, and lack of exceptional positive or negative signals.
Verdict Average, unremarkable open-source participant. You’re not a farming bad actor, but you’re also not building anything that earns real stars, followers, or maintainer trust — your GitHub presence is a collection of niche PR tourism and empty home turf, with no anchor project to your name.