ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity6.6 / 10
Original project quality7.0 / 18
Contribution quality17.2 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact14.1 / 20
Community influence2.6 / 8
Activity authenticity14.9 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Jupyter Notebook91%
C++8%
Python1%
CMake0%
Makefile0%
Domains
automated-securitycalculusdata-visualizationgaussian-distributionlinear-algebramanimmathematical-animationnormal-distributionnumerical-integrationprobability-theorypython-graphicssimulation

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 3 years on GitHub with only 2 total stars, 284 contributions almost all welded to your own 0-star small projects like aix, 6 popular-repo PRs with zero file-level verification, your 4 followers are al

zoldyck13 — 62.40/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: A genuine but low-traction open-source hobbyist whose GitHub activity is almost entirely self-directed personal project work, with no verified impact on popular repos and almost no external community footprint.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity6.6/10Registered 3 years, active across 4 contribution years, last activity 3 days ago. 3 years on the platform is enough time to build a footprint, but you've barely left a mark.
Original project quality7/1816 original repos, 15 non-empty, total stars 2, top repo stars 1 (alterm, a simple SDL2 terminal emulator with a solid README but zero stars; your top-starred repo is a Qwen fine-tuning notebook with only 1 star and low project quality score). 16 original projects and only 2 total stars means your home turf is a barren wasteland, even your best work can't get a single star from anyone but yourself.
Contribution quality17.2/2724 merged PRs out of 32 total, 2 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 3 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs; 22 of your 24 recent merged PRs target your own 0-star aix repo, with only 2 external merged PRs (to repos with 7 and 10 stars respectively). Your contribution portfolio is almost entirely self-serve: your only external merged PRs target repos with fewer stars than a TikTok micro-influencer's post.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact14.1/206 all-time PRs to popular repos (Aseprite 37k stars, Zeek 7.7k stars, Sorbet 3.8k stars, NVIDIA CUDA Quantum 1k stars), 0 commits, 0 verified file-level impact samples. You have 6 PRs to high-star popular repos, but none have verified file-level impact, so they might as well be ghost contributions for all we can confirm.
Community influence2.6/84 followers, 5 following, total stars 2 across all original repos. 4 followers is fewer than the number of completely empty repos in your profile, your community influence is basically a whisper in an empty room.
Activity authenticity14.9/17284 contributions last year, active across 4 years, last activity 3 days ago, no PR flooding or trivial PR farming signals (only 2 trivial recent PRs, 0 external trivial PRs, templated PR ratio 7%). Your activity volume is real and consistent, but it's almost entirely directed at your own personal projects rather than the broader open-source community.

Red flags

  1. All 6 all-time PRs to high-star popular repos (Aseprite, Zeek, Sorbet, NVIDIA CUDA Quantum) have no file-level quality verification, so their actual substance and impact are completely unconfirmed.
  2. Your original project portfolio has 16 repos but only 2 total stars, with most repos being unstarred personal experiments that have never attracted external interest.
  3. Nearly all your recent merged PRs (22 of 24) target your own 0-star aix repository, with almost no contribution to external open-source projects.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects your self-serve contribution pattern, unverified popular-repo PRs, and lack of external traction.

Verdict Normal, unremarkable open-source hobbyist. Your activity is genuine but lacks meaningful external impact or community recognition, with a contribution profile that leans heavily into personal project work rather than broader ecosystem contribution.