Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 With 3 followers, 2 total stars across 10 home repos, 97.6% of popular-repo contributions locked into one 4.9k-star Electron app, and an unverified PR to a 9.5k-star AI project, your GitHub is just a
YOIMIYA66 — 62.30/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A one-trick external contributor whose entire GitHub impact rests on polishing one person's Electron app, while his own repos are a starless wasteland with zero community pull.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 6.8/10 | Registered 3.25 years ago but claims 4 active contribution years, already fudging the timeline before we look at code. |
| Original project quality | 5.8/18 | 10 original repos, 2 total stars, top repo is a 1-star HTML browser fix README with a 0.53 quality score — your home turf is a ghost town, not a project portfolio. |
| Contribution quality | 19.9/27 | 47 merged out of 53 total PRs (2% rejection rate), but 70% of recent work targets a single external Electron app, with only 12% of recent external PRs touching docs/site/CSS — most of your "contribution" is polishing one guy's Settings UI. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 12/20 | 42 PRs and 77 commits across two popular repos, but 97.6% of that volume is concentrated in a single 4.9k-star Electron app; the verified sample shows most changes are settings UI polish, not core maintenance. |
| Community influence | 2.4/8 | 3 followers, 4 following — you're net-negative in the follower economy, and no one's showing up to your repos to prove otherwise. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.4/17 | 445 contributions last year, no templated PR spam or trivial farming detected — the activity is real, it's just all pointed at someone else's project. |
Red flags
- 97.6% of your all-time popular-repo contributions are locked into rullerzhou-afk/clawd-on-desk — if that repo's maintainer gets bored, your entire GitHub impact evaporates overnight.
- Your single PR to the 9.5k-star OpenBMB/MiniCPM repo is not covered by the file-level quality sample, so we have no proof it wasn't a trivial docs or config tweak.
- Your 10 original repos have a combined 2 stars — your standalone project output has zero community traction.
- Your follower count (3) is lower than your following count (4), meaning you're net-negative in social capital on the platform.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your heavy concentration in a single external repo, weak original project traction, and low community influence, so no bump or haircut was needed.
Verdict Average unremarkable NPC — you're a competent external contributor to one specific niche project, but you have no standalone engineering footprint and no community pull to move the needle anywhere else.