ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality11.9 / 18
Contribution quality17.7 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact11.5 / 20
Community influence5.2 / 8
Activity authenticity10.4 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Go54%
C#15%
C15%
C++9%
Java7%
Makefile1%
Domains
baldurs-gatebaldurs-gate-3injectioninjector-gamesonline-gamecivilizationcivilization-vilocal-gameback-endbackendcmscms-backend

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 271 total stars all riding on a Civ6 multiplayer injector, Milvus contributions are your only credible external win, 10 of your 15 closed PRs were shut by yourself, and 26 followers can't even sustain

xaxys — 66.70/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: 9-year GitHub veteran whose entire external reputation is propped up by 10 PRs to Milvus, while his own 35 original repos are mostly game mods and hobby projects that can't crack 200 stars outside a single Civ6 injector, with a PR closure pattern that leans far more into self-serve tinkering than maintainer-recognized work.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/109.1 years old, contributions span 10 calendar years, no anomalous time-travel activity
Original project quality11.9/1835 original repos (33 non-empty, 2 empty), total 271 stars heavily concentrated in xaxys/injciv6 (199 stars, Civ6 multiplayer injector, quality score 0.8); best quality repo is xaxys/MaintainMan (9 stars, 0.9 score) with no attributed org flagship projects
Contribution quality17.7/2720 merged PRs out of 37 total, 2 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (9% rejection rate), 3 self-closed external PRs, 10 self-closed own-repo PRs, only 1 recent trivial PR, 15% recent doc-like PR ratio
Ecosystem / maintenance impact11.5/20All-time 10 PRs + 8 commits into ★45k milvus-io/milvus (the only popular repo in impact scope); 7 of 8 verified impact samples are core engineering, 1 is a docs update, 2 all-time contributions lack file-level samples
Community influence5.2/826 followers, 13 following, 2:1 follower-to-following ratio, no notable community traction beyond Milvus contributions
Activity authenticity10.4/1796 contributions in the last year, last activity 52 days ago, no PR flooding or trivial farming signals, 10% templated PR ratio, no star inflation

Red flags

  • Nearly all external reputation rests on a single repository (milvus-io/milvus, ★45k): all 10 of your all-time popular-repo PRs and all 8 popular-repo commits target this one project, so a broken relationship here erases your entire external credibility overnight.
  • Duplicate entries in the verified Milvus contribution sample (e.g. two near-identical "Fix leak of memory in ParseMallocInfo" PRs and two "Fix redundant string copy of PlaceholderGroup" PRs) inflate the perceived sample size; your actual distinct Milvus contributions may be lower than the listed counts.
  • A recent external PR to the tiny ★8 repo DawningW/ASCII-Sky-War added 31,000 lines of churn across 64 files, which is wildly out of proportion to the project's size and can read as over-contributing rather than collaborative maintenance.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your concentrated external impact, moderate original project quality, and low community footprint, with no evidence of metric farming or manipulation to warrant a bump or haircut.

Verdict Normal, unremarkable long-time contributor. You have real, verifiable core engineering work in a high-star project, but your profile reads like a side-project hobbyist with a single lucky break into a major open-source repo — nothing to write home about, nothing to flag for fraud either.