Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 10-year GitHub account with only 63 total stars, 20 followers vs 52 following, most contributions are CSS tweaks and copy edits for your own docs site, external PRs are all translations and tiny bug f
VChet — 76.70/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Solid score backed by a genuine core PR to vueuse/vueuse, but your public portfolio is overwhelmingly docs/site/CSS work and tiny external fixes, with home repos so starved they total less than a single day's stars for the project you contributed to.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 10.4 years, active across 11 contribution years, last activity today — you’ve been around longer than most frontend framework LTS cycles. |
| Original project quality | 10.4/18 | 24 original repos, 63 total stars, top repo telegram-ad-filter scores 0.92 for quality but only netted 18 stars — your best project is a Telegram ad blocker with fewer users than a niche Vue router has GitHub stars. |
| Contribution quality | 24.1/27 | 106 merged PRs out of 108 total, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 1 self-closed own-repo PR; 9 of 12 verified popular-repo contributions are doc-like (localization, site edits) vs 3 core code changes — you’re far more likely to tweak a README than rewrite a core package. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 12.6/20 | 4 PRs + 3 commits into popular repos all-time, including 2 PRs + 1 commit to vueuse/vueuse (22k stars); verified samples show 9 doc-like contributions (mostly localization.json edits) vs 3 core code changes — your biggest ecosystem footprint is translating strings for other people's projects. |
| Community influence | 3/8 | 20 followers, 52 following — you follow 2.6x more people than follow you, the GitHub equivalent of being the person who laughs at their own jokes in a group chat. |
| Activity authenticity | 16.6/17 | 1410 contributions last year, active across 11 years, no spam or farming signals detected — your activity is real, just heavily skewed toward docs and site polish rather than core engineering. |
Red flags No high-risk farming, spam, or inauthentic activity detected. The only notable pattern is that two-thirds of your recent merged PRs target your own js-f-k docs site, and 75% of your verified popular-repo contributions are doc-like (localization, site/CSS edits) rather than core engineering changes.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. Your low home-star count and doc-heavy contribution mix were already priced into the base score.
Verdict Normal, low-risk account. You have a legitimate core PR to vueuse/vueuse to your name, but the vast majority of your public GitHub activity is docs/site/CSS polish and translation fixes—your engineering impact is far more modest than your 10-year account tenure suggests.