Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Your own repos top out at 101 stars, nearly a third of your external PRs are doc/README touch-ups, and you closed 5 external PRs yourself — your GitHub resume is far more polished than your actual cod
VanillaNahida — 77.70/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Solid cross-ecosystem gig worker with deep xiaozhi/AI bot tooling contributions, but your own repo star ceiling is 101 and a quarter of your PRs are doc patches — reliable labor, not a self-built brand.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 6/10 | Registered 2.6 years, active across 4 contribution years, last activity today. Account is 2.6 years old but you’ve racked up 4 years of contribution credit — either you’re a time traveler or you’re counting pre-GitHub hobby work. |
| Original project quality | 10.1/18 | 59 original repos, 472 total stars, top-starred original repo QQFavoriteExtract (101 stars, 0.62 quality score), highest-quality original repo NTE-Custom-BAGEL (0.85 score, 39 stars). 59 original repos but your highest-starred one only has 101 stars, and your highest-quality tool (NTE-Custom-BAGEL) only pulled 39 — your home turf is a collection of niche tools no one else has bothered to star. |
| Contribution quality | 20/27 | 37 merged PRs out of 44 total, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 5 self-closed external PRs, 0 self-closed own-repo PRs, 8 trivial recent PRs. 37 merged PRs is nothing to sneeze at, but 5 of your external PRs were closed by you before merge, and 8 recent ones are trivial — you’re not a PR spammer, but you’re not always finishing what you start either. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 19.2/20 | All-time 52 contributions (26 PRs + 26 commits) into 8 popular repos with a combined ~85k stars, 11 core vs 5 doc-like verified impact PRs. 52 all-time contributions to repos with a combined 85k+ stars, mostly core code changes — you’re a useful gig worker for the xiaozhi/AI bot ecosystem, even if you don’t build your own empire. |
| Community influence | 6.3/8 | 151 followers, 6 following. 151 followers for 2.6 years on the platform, following only 6 accounts — you’re not a follow-farming simp, but you’re also not a community magnet either. |
| Activity authenticity | 16.1/17 | 856 contributions last year, 4 activity types, no bot/PR flooding signals. 856 contributions last year with no PR flooding or templated spam flags — your activity is real, just heavily weighted toward other people’s projects. |
Red flags
- 5 external PRs to other people's repos were closed by you before they were merged — you have a habit of abandoning contribution work halfway.
- Roughly 1 in 4 of your recent external PRs target documentation, READMEs, or config files rather than core code — you're more of a window-washer than an engine-rebuilder for big projects.
- Your 59 original repos have a combined 472 stars, with your most popular one (QQFavoriteExtract) only hitting 101 — your home-grown projects haven't found much of an audience.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. Your original project star ceiling is low enough and your doc-touch-up PR share is high enough that the base score already priced in the right amount of credit.
Verdict Normal. You’re a reliable, low-drama contributor to the xiaozhi and AI bot open-source ecosystem, but you’re not yet a standalone name people follow for your own work.