🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Your own repos top out at 16 stars and your profile repo is just a "Hi" in an empty folder, but you’ve shipped non-trivial Rust core PRs to 3k+ star IronRDP with zero related repo contributor rejections. Solid core
uchouT — 76.70/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: A low-key core-code grinder with a perfect zero-rejection PR record on popular repos, whose own project portfolio is so low-star it makes his 17-follower count look generous by comparison.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 7.19 years on GitHub, 8 years of active contributions, 632 contributions last year, last activity 0 days ago. No gaps or dormancy to speak of. |
| Original project quality | 7.3/18 | 8 original repos, 20 total stars, top starred is qb-downloader (16 stars, 0.51 quality score), best quality is nyat (4 stars, 0.85 score). All 8 original repos combine for just 20 stars, with the most popular being a qBittorrent task splitter that hasn’t attracted a single fork in its lifetime — your home turf is a ghost town compared to the popular repos you contribute to. |
| Contribution quality | 23/27 | 46 merged PRs out of 51 total, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 3 self-closed external PRs, 0 self-closed own-repo PRs, 0 trivial PRs in the recent sample. 46 merged PRs with a perfect zero maintainer-rejection rate and zero trivial typo-fix drive-bys, though 3 external PRs were abandoned by the author before completion — no one’s turning your work away, but you don’t finish every race you start either. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 15.7/20 | 24 all-time contributions (13 PRs + 11 commits) to repos with 381k, 3.4k, and 3k stars; 9 of these have verified file samples showing core code changes, 4 contributions lack file-level verification (counted as coverage context only). 24 total all-time contributions to high-star popular repos including a 381k-star project, with all verified samples showing non-trivial core Rust and Java feature work, no docs or site-decorator fluff — you’re upgrading the engine, not polishing the bumper stickers. |
| Community influence | 4.9/8 | 17 followers, 7 following. 17 followers for a 7-year account with a solid core contribution record is a sign your work flies well under the community radar — no star-begging or follower-farming detected, just a quiet worker nobody’s watching. |
| Activity authenticity | 15.8/17 | 632 contributions last year, activity across 4 types (code, PRs, issues, reviews), 8 active years. 632 contributions last year with genuine spread across code, PRs, issues, and reviews, no bot-like spike or farming patterns detected — this is real work, not a contribution farm. |
Red flags
- The single contribution to the 381k-star openclaw/openclaw repo has no file-level verification available, so its substance can't be fully confirmed (it is only counted as coverage context for impact metrics, not a scored negative).
- 73% of recent merged PRs target the stello-agent/stello repo, creating a narrow recent contribution concentration even if all changes are substantive.
- All original public repos have fewer than 20 stars combined, with the personal profile repo containing only a one-line greeting and no code or project showcase.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for the verified core contributions to popular repos and the near-invisible personal project portfolio appropriately.
Verdict Normal, low-risk account with a strong track record of non-trivial core contributions to popular open source projects, no signs of farming, fake activity, or resume padding. His only consistent weakness is a personal project portfolio that fails to match the quality of his external contributions.