🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 A third of your 150 merged PRs are templated duplicates, all recent work is dumped into a 2-star repo, your only high-star loguru contribution has zero file-level verification, and your 36 original re
ThomasOli — 67.30/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: High PR counts and contribution volume are just noise: nearly a third of your merged PRs are templated duplicates dumped into a 2-star repo, your only high-star popular-repo contribution has zero file-level verification, and none of your 36 original projects broke 5 stars — this is GitHub resume theater at its most transparent.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 7 years on GitHub with 8 active contribution years and 0 days since last activity, yet you still can't get a single original repo past 5 stars |
| Original project quality | 9.2/18 | 36 original repos, 108 total stars, max 5 stars per repo; top repo is SoccerApp (5 stars, 0.75 quality score) — your entire portfolio has fewer stars than a single viral cat TikTok |
| Contribution quality | 23.1/27 | 150 merged PRs, 154 total PRs, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 0 author-closed external/own-repo PRs; 33% templated PR ratio, 6 identical "Feat/announcements overhaul" titles in recent sample, 100% of recent merged PRs target the 2-star courseconnect-team/courseconnect repo — you've turned PR spamming into a full-time job, building nothing but duplicate commit messages |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 9.7/20 | 1 PR + 1 commit into ★23,990 loguru (all-time popular-repo total); 0 file-level verified samples for this contribution, no other popular-repo work — your entire high-star impact rests on a single unverified PR, which is GitHub's version of name-dropping a celebrity you met once at a party |
| Community influence | 4.4/8 | 8 followers, 4 following — your follower count is lower than the number of templated PRs you submitted to a single 2-star repo, a new low even for GitHub's most dedicated contribution counters |
| Activity authenticity | 15.9/17 | 3,036 contributions last year, 8 active contribution years; high volume is entirely concentrated in a single low-star repo with duplicated PR titles, no organic cross-project engagement — you're not building software, you're grinding the GitHub contribution graph like it's a mobile game karma farm |
Red flags
- Your only all-time contribution to a high-star popular repository (loguru, 23,990 stars) has zero file-level verification, so there is no proof this was substantive code work rather than a trivial typo fix or unmerged attempt.
- 100% of your recent 50 merged PRs target the 2-star courseconnect-team/courseconnect repository, including 6 identical "Feat/announcements overhaul" titles and a 33% overall templated PR ratio, indicating non-organic, bulk submission patterns rather than genuine collaborative contribution.
- Your 3,036 yearly contributions and 150 merged PRs are completely disconnected from community recognition: you have only 8 followers, and none of your 36 original repositories have more than 5 stars, meaning your work has resonated with exactly no one outside of your own commit history.
- Multiple recent PRs feature extreme churn (e.g., 14,603 lines changed in a single "Researchpage" PR) with no corresponding evidence of lasting impact, code quality, or community adoption of your changes.
Score calibration No extra adjustment beyond the -5 manual haircut. The base score overvalued your unverified popular-repo claim, templated PR concentration, and the massive gap between your activity volume and actual tangible impact.
Verdict Needs human review. This is textbook GitHub resume theater: you've traded real code substance for high PR counts and contribution metrics, with zero verified popular-repo impact, no original projects with meaningful visibility, and a follower count so low it's almost a cry for help. Any hiring manager or open-source maintainer who takes your profile at face value without verifying your loguru contribution is setting themselves up for a rude surprise.