← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…
Score breakdown
Account maturity8.6 / 10
Original project quality6.5 / 18
Contribution quality17.0 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact9.9 / 20
Community influence5.2 / 8
Activity authenticity14.2 / 17
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 After 4.76 years on GitHub, 94% of your 16 PRs are dumped into a single 4.2k-star repo open-compass/VLMEvalKit as free labor, your best original project only has 299 stars with a terrible quality scor
SYuan03 — 60.30/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: Legitimate, substantive contributor to the popular VLMEvalKit open source project with no red flags, but a weak original project portfolio and skewed follow-to-follower ratio limit their overall standing.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 8.5/10 | Registered 4.75 years, active across 6 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago |
| Original project quality | 6.5/18 | 17 non-empty original repos, total 535 stars; top-starred repo is low-quality Skill-Anything (299 stars, 0.16 quality score), highest-quality original repo MM-IFEngine has 122 stars and 0.85 quality score |
| Contribution quality | 17/27 | 14 merged PRs, 16 total PRs; 2 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs (13% rejection rate), 0 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs; 2 recent trivial PRs, majority are substantive code changes |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 9.9/20 | 15 substantive PRs + 18 commits to the ★4244 open-compass/VLMEvalKit repo (all-time impact, only popular external repo); contributions include new benchmark integrations, model support additions, and bug fixes, with 11 verified core PRs and 0 doc-like PRs |
| Community influence | 4.2/8 | 120 followers, following 305 users (2.5x follow-to-follower ratio) |
| Activity authenticity | 14.2/17 | 425 contributions in the last year, 3 activity types, no signs of automated or fake activity |
| Red flags: None | ||
| Manual adjustment: None (0) — no significant positive or negative signals were missed by the scoring script; all contributions are legitimate with no spam or farming activity, and limitations of the original project portfolio are already accounted for in the base score. | ||
| Verdict: Normal user, no action required; contributions are valid but the profile lacks high-impact original work. |