🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
Phigros (com.PigeonGames.Phigros) 历史版本收集. Collection for old (special) version.
JavaScript通过监听来自工作和社交APP的通知，将事件登记到您的日历中。
KotlinA suite of scripts use to backup app data on recovery. Suitable for that smartphone cannot boot properly
ShellSupport mt6572/82/92 3.4.67 kernel one step port Support mt6735(m)/37(m) 3.18.22 kernel one step port maybe more
My Blog Post & Articles.
JavaScriptA testing tool for simulating and triggering Wireless Emergency Alerts (WEA) and Earthquake & Tsunami Warning Systems (ETWS) on Android devices.
Kotlin🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 All 7 high-star popular-repo PRs are unverified zero-core contributions, only 33% of your external PRs have real substance, 71 of your 109 repos are forks — you call this ELITE? Wring the resume paddi
SteveZMTstudios — 75.60/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Genuine activity and a couple of usable Android tooling repos, but the ELITE score is inflated by unverified PRs to mega-popular projects and a fork hoard — the ecosystem impact claim falls apart under even light scrutiny.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 8.2/10 | 4.43 years old, active across 5 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — shows up consistently, even if most output is blog posts and fork maintenance. |
| Original project quality | 12.7/18 | 199 total stars across 38 original repos, top star is 114 for Phigros-history (a game version archive with a 6k-word README but no real engineering substance), best usable project calsync only has 14 stars — home turf is mostly niche tools and glorified collections. |
| Contribution quality | 23.1/27 | 58 merged PRs out of 82 total, only 2 maintainer-closed unmerged, but 17 of 50 recent merged PRs are trivial, 37 are doc-like, and 0 of 7 all-time high-star impact PRs have file-level verification — most "ecosystem" work is polishing READMEs and blog posts, not shipping core code. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 15.6/20 | 7 all-time PRs into repos with a combined 111k+ stars (including 61k-star Magisk and 43k-star FlClash), 0 commits, 0 verified core contributions — those high-star PRs are unproven, and a large share of recent external work is just adding links to personal blog indexes. |
| Community influence | 4.6/8 | 49 followers, 36 following — your follower count is barely higher than the number of repos you've forked, and you're not exactly a community magnet. |
| Activity authenticity | 16.4/17 | 1151 contributions last year, 4 activity types — you're clearly active, but most of that activity is pushing blog images and updating your own 3-star articles repo, not shipping meaningful open-source work. |
Red flags
- All 7 all-time PRs to high-star popular repos (including 61k-star Magisk and 43k-star FlClash) have zero file-level verification, so there's no proof they are substantive or non-trivial changes.
- Zero core contributions and zero doc-like classified contributions across all your high-star repo impact PRs, making the "ecosystem impact" claim entirely unsubstantiated.
- Only 33% of your recent external PRs are doc-like, with a huge share of activity dedicated to maintaining your own low-star personal blog instead of contributing to other projects.
- 71 of your 109 public repos are forks, meaning you consume far more open-source code than you create.
- PRs to security-critical projects like Magisk require manual verification to rule out low-quality or risky changes.
Score calibration The base score was reduced by 5 points because the ELITE-tier claim is unsupported: all 7 high-star popular-repo PRs lack file-level verification, recent external PRs are only 33% substantive, and a large share of activity is dedicated to maintaining a low-star personal blog rather than ecosystem contributions.
Verdict Needs human review: the unverified high-star repo PRs and heavy fork/blog activity mean the ELITE label is unproven — this looks more like open-source resume padding than top-tier dev work.