🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
A curated collection of the strongest NotebookLM slide prompts sourced from the real creative underground . Your go-to resource for AI powerpoint :P
SBTI 人格测试完整结果图鉴 · 27 种结局的中文 Wiki（25 标准人格 + HHHH 兜底 + DRUNK 隐藏）· https://sbti-wiki.pages.dev
HTMLA curated collection of the best /loop, /goal, and /schedule uses for Claude Code & Codex — real commands sourced from Twitter/X. The awesome-list of agent loops.
Citation Check Skill is a lightweight, opinionated citation validation layer designed to detect, verify, and enforce citations in LLM outputs.
A high-quality collection of study skills built for high school and college students, teachers, and TAs. Use it directly in Kael.im for free without installing skills
PythonPrompt-native interactive HTML docs — bdocs. Generate, comment on, and publish docs from inside codex &Claude Code.
JavaScript🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 All 4,010 stars are dumped into a single awesome-list repo, you dared to score 88 with ecosystem impact propped up by just 2 external PRs, and you're pretending the 240 unknown-closed PRs don't exist?
serenakeyitan — 78.30/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: An awesome-list power user who treats GitHub like a resume cover, with ecosystem impact inflated by own-repo commits and 240 ghost closed PRs the base score swept under the rug.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 8.4/10 | Registered 4.64 years, active for 6 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — at least the daily posting habit is real, even if a lot of it is self-serve PRs to your own 91-star tdoc repo. |
| Original project quality | 15.6/18 | 4,790 total stars, but 4,010 of them come from a single curated awesome-list of NotebookLM prompts (awesome-notebookLM-prompts) — your home turf is a prompt scrapbook, not a software workshop, and most of your 79 nonempty original repos are curated lists or prompt collections. |
| Contribution quality | 26.9/27 | 354 merged PRs out of 788 total, with only 4 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs — your own repo PRs are a well-oiled self-merge machine, with 90 author-closed own-repo PRs and only 6 author-closed external PRs. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 13.8/20 | All-time popular-repo contributions total 2 PRs + 19 commits, but 18 of those commits are to your own awesome-notebookLM-prompts repo; only 2 unverified PRs to paperclipai/paperclip (72k stars) count as external impact, with zero validated file-level samples to prove they're substantive. |
| Community influence | 6.6/8 | 242 followers with only 22 following — healthy ratio, but your star-to-follower conversion is abysmal: 4k+ stars on a single repo and barely 200 followers to show for it. |
| Activity authenticity | 17/17 | 5,229 contributions last year across 4 activity types, 6 straight years of active contribution, and last activity was today — the activity volume is genuine, even if a large chunk is self-serve work on your own repos. |
Red flags
- 240 unknown closed unmerged PRs: You have 240 closed PRs with no clear closure reason, indicating either a high volume of low-quality external submissions or abandoned PRs; the base score's 1% maintainer rejection rate completely buried this massive chunk of unaccounted contribution churn.
- Ecosystem impact inflation: Your popular-repo impact count incorrectly includes 18 commits to your own awesome-notebookLM-prompts repo, counting own-repo work as external maintenance impact; the only actual external popular-repo contributions are 2 unverified PRs to paperclipai/paperclip, with no file-level samples to confirm their substance.
- Star concentration risk: 4,010 of your 4,790 total stars (84%) come from a single awesome-list repo, which is low-effort content aggregation, not engineered software — your star count is a prompt collection hit, not a signal of code quality or engineering impact.
- Original project quality gap: 79 of your 84 original repos are curated lists, prompt collections, or frontend/UI wrappers, with no core engineering projects of note — your home turf is a content farm, not a software shop.
- Insufficient external contribution sample: Only 6 recent external PRs were inspected, far too small a sample to validate the quality of your external open-source work, especially given the 788 total PRs you've submitted.
Score calibration The 10-point reduction corrects two critical errors in the base score: misclassifying 18 own-repo commits as external ecosystem maintenance work, and masking 240 unknown closed PRs behind a misleadingly low 1% maintainer rejection rate that only counts explicitly maintainer-closed PRs.
Verdict Needs human review — your profile looks impressive on the surface with 4k+ stars and 354 merged PRs, but the substance is concentrated in curated lists and self-serve repo work, with unvalidated external impact and a mountain of unaccounted closed PRs that make the true contribution quality impossible to verify at a glance.