ghfind
Anonymous77.9分人上人!碰过cpython的大佬?
Anonymous77.9 tier and CPython contrib? Absolute legend.
Anonymous赛博账房+Nix包工,这配置太顶了
AnonymousNix packager with nixpkgs commits? Based as hell.
AnonymousPR缝补匠实锤,小项目都缝得整齐
AnonymousBeancount tinkerer plus autobean tools? Chef's kiss.
Anonymousbio空但贡献全是硬货,respect
AnonymousEmpty bio but huge OSS footprint? Mad respect.
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality13.0 / 18
Contribution quality19.3 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact17.9 / 20
Community influence4.2 / 8
Activity authenticity13.5 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Python67%
CoffeeScript22%
Nix11%

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 13-year GitHub account with 63 followers, nearly half your recent PRs are trivial patches for big-name projects, and you spammed 3 near-identical Yahoo Finance fixes — your open-source resume is just

SEIAROTg — 77.90/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: Solid 14-year contributor with real engineering credits to CPython, Podman, and NixOS, but recent trivial PR spam and a follower count smaller than your following list keep you firmly in middle-tier obscurity.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 13.36 years, active across 14 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — you’ve been on GitHub longer than most users have been alive online, and you never quit.
Original project quality13/1827 original repos with 616 total stars, top star 366 on quadlet-nix (quality score 0.85, a real usable Nix/Podman tool), plus the autobean beancount tool suite with active PyPI publishing — no empty fork graveyards, no star inflation, just actual usable tools.
Contribution quality19.3/2715 merged of 19 total PRs, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 1 self-closed external PR; recent 15 PR sample has 7 trivial entries (46.7% trivial ratio) including 3 near-duplicate Yahoo Finance fixes across beancount repos — you ship code that gets merged, but a lot of it is low-lift window dressing on other people's projects.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact17.9/209 PRs + 7 commits across 5 popular repos totaling 137,228 stars (including CPython, Podman, NixOS/nixpkgs), with 4 core and 2 doc-like changes in the verified file sample — you’re not just polishing docs, you’ve landed real changes in projects that power millions of workflows.
Community influence4.2/863 followers, 98 following — your contribution breadth is way bigger than your audience, no influencer energy, just quiet work that doesn’t draw a crowd.
Activity authenticity13.5/1770 contributions last year across 4 activity types, no bot-like spikes or erratic gaps — steady, human-paced work, no fake activity here.

Red flags

  • Nearly half your recent merged PR sample (7 of 15) are trivial changes, including 3 near-identical Yahoo Finance API fixes sent to separate beancount repos — this low-effort bulk patching looks more like KPI hunting than meaningful engineering, even if it’s not abusive.
  • Follower count (63) is shockingly low for a 13-year account with credits to CPython, Podman, and NixOS/nixpkgs, suggesting your work doesn’t resonate enough to build a community.
  • One external PR was self-closed before merge, a small but unflattering blip in your otherwise clean PR record.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base 77.9 already accounts for your strong all-time popular-repo impact, solid original project quality, and the minor drag from trivial recent PR volume and low community reach.

Verdict Normal, reliable open-source contributor with real engineering credits to big-name projects, but held back by recent low-value PR volume and a nearly non-existent community footprint. You’re the dependable handyman of open source, not the star architect — solid, but not memorable.