🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 8-year account with 33 stars, 70% of PRs dumped into a single Chingu cohort repo, and 114 days of silence—this is GitHub resume theater, not open source contribution.
Roupiye — 62.30/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A niche hobbyist propped up by a single Grey Hack script repo and a Chingu cohort project, with a starved portfolio and near-dormant activity that caps potential at thoroughly average.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 8.25-year-old account with contributions spanning 9 calendar years; vintage presence, not a fresh account gaming the system |
| Original project quality | 9.7/18 | 33 stars across 35 original repos; the flagship grey-hack-repo (21★, 0.89 quality) is a niche Grey Hack script hub, not a broadly useful project |
| Contribution quality | 22.6/27 | 66/71 PRs merged (93% rate), 1 maintainer-closed unmerged; recent sample is 70% stacked in one Chingu cohort repo, and only 4% of recent PRs are doc-like, so this is mostly code, not window dressing |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 11/20 | 3 PRs + 1 commit into ★6767 bkeepers/dotenv, ★1516 excid3/tailwindcss-stimulus-components, and ★1301 Shopify/maintenance_tasks all-time; 1 verified core file sample (leastbad/optimism) — real but narrow reach |
| Community influence | 3.8/8 | 30 followers versus 44 following; slightly elevated follow ratio, negligible community footprint |
| Activity authenticity | 5.2/17 | 6 contributions last year, 114 days since last activity; this account isn't dead, but it's running on GitHub fumes |
Red flags
- 114 days of inactivity with only 6 contributions in the past year — this isn't a maintainer, it's a ghost who shows up once a quarter.
- Severe PR concentration: 70% of recent merged PRs target a single Chingu cohort team repo (chingu-voyages/v40-bears-team-29), so the recent sample overstates external contribution breadth; much of the work there is React component styling and bulk merges in a learning project.
- Sparse impact verification: Only 1 file-level sample exists for all-time popular-repo contributions, so the 3 all-time popular-repo PRs have limited granular backing.
Score calibration No extra adjustment.
Verdict Normal. The base 62.3/100 already captures the mix of legitimate but narrow external contributions, a hobby-project portfolio with minimal stars, and near-dormant recent activity.