Score breakdown
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 You dropped 77 PRs into a single go-kratos/gateway repo alone, and act as a free screw for big projects like dragonfly and pywebview, but your own repos top out at 24 stars, your total star count is l
realityone — 82.10/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: Reliable high-skill open-source contributor with a track record of real core work across popular projects, but your personal project portfolio is a barren wasteland — you’re a top-tier gig worker for other people’s repos, not a home-turf builder.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 13.23 years, active across 14 contribution years with zero days since last activity — you’ve been on GitHub longer than most devs have been coding, no maturity complaints here. |
| Original project quality | 9.4/18 | 37 original repos net just 161 total stars, your hottest home project maxes out at 24 stars — your personal project portfolio is an open-source yard sale nobody stops at. |
| Contribution quality | 23.7/27 | 157 merged out of 177 total PRs, 6 maintainer-closed unmerged, 10 author-closed external PRs, 1 author-closed own-repo PR, 4% rejection rate, 7 trivial recent PRs, no PR flooding — your external contribution quality is solid, you just refuse to put that effort into your own repos. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 18.9/20 | All-time 88 PRs + 78 commits across 8 popular repos totaling ~39,900 combined stars; verified file samples are quality checks only, not the full contribution count — you’re a high-value external contributor, if only you’d treat your own repos half as well. |
| Community influence | 5.4/8 | 162 followers, 141 following, near 1:1 follow ratio for a 13-year account with 157 merged PRs — you’re not an influencer, you’re a contributor who shows up to work and goes home without building a personal brand. |
| Activity authenticity | 14.7/17 | 654 contributions last year across 3 activity types, no PR flooding, no star inflation, no inauthentic activity flags — your output is real, just entirely directed at other people’s projects. |
Red flags None — no suspicious activity, PR farming, templated bulk contributions, or inauthentic contribution patterns detected.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects your solid external core contributions, low-quality own repos, and lack of red flags; no extra bump or haircut was applied.
Verdict Normal. You’re a consistent, trusted open-source contributor who ships real, non-trivial work to popular projects — the only glaring gap is your own personal project portfolio, which looks like a contribution ghost town.