ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity8.6 / 10
Original project quality4.7 / 18
Contribution quality14.5 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact18.1 / 20
Community influence2.5 / 8
Activity authenticity12.5 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
JavaScript38%
HTML21%
SCSS19%
Jupyter Notebook11%
Python4%
Shell4%

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 4 years on GitHub, zero stars across all your own repos, 27 forks and a templated personal page as your entire portfolio, riding 85k-star vllm PRs to polish a resume that's way shinier than your actua

qianlihuang — 60.90/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: A GitHub user who treats open source as a spectator sport: all substantive value comes from contributing to other people’s marquee projects, while their own profile is a barren wasteland of zero-star forks and a templated personal page. No bot activity, but also no real original impact to speak of.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity8.6/10Registered 4.8 years, contributions span 6 calendar years; no time-travel anomalies, just sporadic activity spread thinner than your fork collection.
Original project quality4.7/183 original repos, zero total stars across all of them, and your most "polished" project is a forked personal page template you didn't even bother to promote — your home turf is a ghost town.
Contribution quality14.5/278 merged PRs out of 33 total submissions, 3 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 14 author-closed external PRs, 1 author-closed own-repo PR — you close more PRs than you get merged, and the maintainers' close button is worn thin from bouncing your work.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact18.1/20All-time 28 PRs and 8 commits across 4 popular repos, including 16 PRs to vllm-project/vllm (85k stars) and 8 PRs to sgl-project/sglang (29k stars) — you're a reliable gig worker for other people's flagship projects, but you don't own any of the real estate.
Community influence2.5/89 followers, 87 following — you're the simp of the GitHub follow graph, chasing clout from projects you'll never get to contribute to at a meaningful level.
Activity authenticity12.5/1779 contributions last year, no bot or farming signals, only 1 trivial PR in the recent sample — your activity is genuine, just painfully unremarkable and entirely focused on other people's codebases.

Red flags

  • All 3 of your original repos have zero total stars, including the personal page template you last updated 4 months ago.
  • You closed 14 external PRs yourself, more than the 8 you successfully got merged — you abandon more contributions than you complete.
  • Your highest-rated original project is a forked Jekyll academic website template with no meaningful custom work, passed off as your own flagship.
  • Your follow-to-follower ratio is nearly 10:1, a textbook signal of clout-chasing rather than organic community influence.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your weak original project footprint, low community influence, and high share of contribution work directed at other people's popular repos.

Verdict Normal, unremarkable open source participant — you show up to contribute to big projects occasionally, but have no original impact, no community clout, and a profile that reads like a resume cover letter for someone else's codebase.