🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
Radiogenomics anaylsis to TCGA-GBM(https://wiki.cancerimagingarchive.net/display/Public/TCGA-GBM)
PythonLearning verification through the Socratic Method — AI-powered questioning skills for Claude Code & Codex
NewlineReplacer is a useful .py file to replace your newline with space. It is very useful when you want to copy some essays.😏
HTMLFile Tree visualization with good looking to help you write your README
Pythona wechat app which can help college boy to do their skin care.
JavaScript🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Following 50 but only 23 followers, your 65 original repos top out at 6 stars, and you survive on patching high-star external projects for clout — your GitHub is just a resume cover with a faint home
PinkR1ver — 76.30/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: A reliable external code contributor who ships real fixes to popular open-source projects, but his own repo portfolio is a star-starved wasteland and his follow behavior reeks of clout-chasing.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 7.13 years old, contributions span 8 calendar years of activity |
| Original project quality | 9.5/18 | 65 original repos, 60 non-empty, total 54 stars, top repo PinkR1ver/NewlineReplacer is a trivial newline utility with just 6 stars |
| Contribution quality | 19.4/27 | 32 merged PRs out of 42 total; 3 maintainer-closed unmerged, 3 self-closed external, 3 self-closed own-repo PRs |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 18.9/20 | 18 PRs + 11 commits into 9 popular repos with a combined ~58k stars (all-time total; 7 verified file-level samples are for quality review only, not the full contribution count) |
| Community influence | 3.1/8 | 23 followers, follows 50 — a follow ratio that screams clout-chasing over earned influence |
| Activity authenticity | 15.4/17 | 451 contributions in the last year, active as of today |
Red flags
- Inverted follow/follower ratio: 50 follows vs 23 followers, a textbook clout-simp signal that outweighs any earned influence.
- Barren home turf: 65 original repos pull in just 54 total stars, with your top project a trivial newline replacement script that maxed out at 6 stars.
- Low-value external work: 5 of your 32 recent merged PRs are trivial (screenshot updates, README list edits, typo fixes), and 38% of recent external PRs target docs/site/examples content rather than core engineering.
- Data bloat in own repos: one of your Radiogenomics-GBM PRs dumped 80,000+ image files in a single commit, which reads as bulk data dumping rather than meaningful code contribution.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects your solid external contribution track record, weak personal project traction, and low community influence; no additional qualitative signals warranted a bump or haircut.
Verdict Normal, trustworthy for collaborating on popular open-source repos, but don't expect flagship original engineering work from this account — your GitHub is a resume cover, not a portfolio.