← Back to Hall of Fame
🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality10.9 / 18
Contribution quality20.5 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact9.8 / 20
Community influence5.4 / 8
Activity authenticity17.0 / 17
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
miner-proxy⭐ 138
it free, 高性能加密传输矿工与矿池中的数据, 适用所有币种/ssl/tcp,
GoSpiderMan⭐ 12
SpiderMan Based on Scrapy, scrapyd, scrapy-API, tornado spider distributed management framework.
PythonGetAnything-Server⭐ 1
Get any website, app media resources on the mobile side
Gojson2object⭐ 1
面向对象的方式访问json
Pythonperrornet⭐ 0
helix-relayer-runner⭐ 0
Go🧬 Stack & domains
Top languages
Python85%
Go10%
HTML4%
Shell0%
Dockerfile0%
Batchfile0%
Domains
encryptionergoethminerproxyscrapyscrapy-apiscrapydspiderman
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Your 138-star miner-proxy has been gathering dust since 2023, 73 forks are pure bookmark hoarding, 14 self-closed external PRs read like abandoned experiments, and your profile repo is nothing but met
perrornet — 73.60/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Legitimate external contributions exist, but his own repo lineup is a wasteland and his GitHub activity reads like open-source resume theater.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | 9.6 years registered, 11 active contribution years, last activity 0 days ago — old enough to remember when GitHub was for sharing code, not just curating a resume. |
| Original project quality | 10.9/18 | Total original stars 152, with 138 of those locked in a single repo (miner-proxy, quality score 0.75) that hasn't seen a push since May 2023; 73 of 101 total repos are forks, turning his profile into a bookmark graveyard. |
| Contribution quality | 20.5/27 | 36 merged PRs out of 55 total, with only 1 maintainer-closed unmerged PR; 14 self-closed external PRs suggest he treats open-source contribution queues as a personal scratchpad, spamming changes then bailing when they don't get immediate traction. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 9.8/20 | All-time popular-repo contributions total just 10 (5 PRs + 5 commits) across 4 repos with ~1.2k combined stars; his verified impact sample is half you-get extractor patches, the rest are trivial CI config tweaks and Helm doc additions — no core engineering lift to speak of. |
| Community influence | 5.4/8 | 35 followers for a 9.6-year account with 100+ repos — his follower count is lower than the star count of his own top original repo, and he follows fewer people than he has fork repos. |
| Activity authenticity | 17/17 | 3,115 contributions last year across 11 active years, no bot or inflation signals — just a human who churns out a high volume of low-value PRs when the mood strikes. |
| Red flags |
- 73 of 101 public repos are forks, with only one original repo (miner-proxy, 138★) showing any traction, and it hasn't been updated since May 2023 — his home turf is a fork graveyard with a single dormant project.
- 14 of his 30 recent external PRs were closed by the author himself, with only 1 actual maintainer-closed unmerged PR — he spams changes to popular repos then bails when they don't get immediate attention.
- His profile repo (perrornet) contains nothing but GitHub metrics visualization widgets, no actual project code, documentation, or useful content — his GitHub presence is primarily persona packaging, not engineering output. Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects the shallow ecosystem impact, high fork share, and low-substance original project lineup; no mandatory delta triggers were met. Verdict Normal, low-risk account with legitimate but extremely shallow external contributions — his GitHub is less an engineering portfolio and more an open-source business card held together by fork bookmarks and metrics widgets.