🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Ten-year account leaning on a single 659-star org-attributed project for clout, half your external PRs are just polishing doc windows for big-name repos, 28 of your 198 popular-repo contributions are
panpan0000 — 70.30/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Long-time GitHub user with high volume of popular-repo PRs, but the vast majority of that impact is documentation/site/examples work rather than core engineering, so the original 80.3 score was overbaked and received a mandatory haircut.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 10.8 years, with contributions spanning 12 calendar years — no time-travel anomalies, just a long, consistent presence on the platform. |
| Original project quality | 15.6/18 | Total stars across all original repos sit at 671, almost all from the org-attributed cloudtty/cloudtty project (659 stars, quality score 1); every other original repo is starless or single-star with no meaningful standalone traction. |
| Contribution quality | 27/27 | 221 merged PRs out of 414 total submissions; 38 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 41 author-closed external PRs, 21 author-closed own-repo PRs — a 15% rejection rate with no extreme red flags, though the doc-like share of work is unusually high. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 8/20 | 198 PRs + 249 commits into 58 popular repos with a combined 3.8M+ stars; capped at 8 because the verified sample of your popular-repo contributions shows 28 docs/site/examples/templates PRs vs only 21 core code PRs, and your recent external PRs are 54% doc-like, confirming your ecosystem footprint is heavily documentation-centric rather than focused on core engineering. |
| Community influence | 4.9/8 | 76 followers and 54 following — a perfectly average, unremarkable follower ratio with no social proof boost to speak of. |
| Activity authenticity | 14.8/17 | 245 contributions in the last year, with activity recorded as recently as today — activity is real and consistent, with no signs of botted or ghostwritten contributions. |
Red flags
- Your all-time popular-repo impact is heavily skewed toward documentation, site, example, and template work: the verified sample shows 28 doc-like contributions vs only 21 core code PRs, so your ecosystem footprint is mostly window dressing for big projects rather than meaningful core engineering input.
- Your recent external PRs are 54% doc-like, just under the automatic cap threshold, but the pattern is unambiguously documentation-centric — you are far more likely to edit a README or site page than touch core runtime code in high-star repos.
- Your only high-star original project is cloudtty/cloudtty, which is an org-attributed project you maintain rather than a solo-built flagship; all your own original repos are starless or single-star with no meaningful community traction, so your home turf is a barren wasteland compared to your big-project PR tourism.
Score calibration A -10 adjustment was applied to respect the impact quality cap: your all-time popular-repo contributions are documentation/site/examples-heavy, with a 54% recent external doc-like ratio and a verified sample split of 28 doc-like vs 21 core PRs, so the original 80.3 score overvalued non-core ecosystem work. No further adjustments were made.
Verdict Needs human review: on paper, your 221 merged PRs and 249 popular-repo commits look impressive, but the core engineering substance is too thin to support a high trust score without padding documentation and site work as equivalent to core code contributions.