🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 25k+ stars, 25k+ of which are from org-attributed repos; your 35 self-made original repos are mostly starless wasteland, you spend all day bumping package versions in nixpkgs as a NixOS janitor, and y
ocfox — 93.80/100 · GOD (Legendary · Hall of Fame)
TL;DR: A NixOS maintenance workhorse with legitimate long-term core contributions to nixpkgs, but his own original project portfolio is a starless wasteland that does almost nothing to justify his massive star count.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 7.4 years, contributions span 8 calendar years |
| Original project quality | 18/18 | 25,487 total stars across all repos, but 25,292 come from org-attributed flagship projects (NixOS/nixpkgs, telezig/tz); self-owned original repos top out at 166 stars (nixpkgs-tracker) with most sitting at 0-3 stars |
| Contribution quality | 25.7/27 | 131 merged PRs out of 160 total; 5 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 22 author-closed external PRs, 0 author-closed own-repo PRs; recent sample has a 36% trivial PR share, but this aligns with routine nixpkgs package maintenance work |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 128 PRs + 188 commits across 13 popular repos with a combined 176k+ stars (all-time); verified file-level sample covers 12 PRs, including 52 core and 10 docs/site/touch-up contributions |
| Community influence | 4.8/8 | 65 followers, 58 following — a near 1:1 ratio with zero follower farming, which is either humble or a sign no one's watching your personal project graveyard |
| Activity authenticity | 15.3/17 | 1,124 contributions in the last year, active across 3 activity types, last activity 0 days ago |
Red flags None detected. No star inflation, PR flooding, bot-like signals, or maintainer rejection patterns of concern.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your strong long-term core maintenance of NixOS/nixpkgs, legitimate cross-project contributions (including a non-trivial feature PR to iawia002/lux), and low PR rejection rate, with no missed qualitative signals that would warrant a bump or haircut.
Verdict Normal, high-trust open-source contributor with a heavy specialization in Nix package maintenance — your personal project portfolio is the only thing keeping this from being a flawless profile.