🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
Builds a persistent knowledge graph about you as you talk, entities extracted from every conversation, stored in Neo4j, with Redis-backed history and Groq inference
PythonPersonal GitHub Pages site and portfolio
HTML🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 195 forks hoarded, 0 stars across all 5 original repos, 3,175 last-year contributions are almost all external patches, plus a 1.4MB venv dump in your own MCP-Server and 35% of PRs closed by related repo contributor
nandanadileep — 76.30/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Solid score propped up by external patches to high-star repos, but a zero-star home turf and 35% maintainer PR rejection rate that blows a hole in the "trustworthy" label.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 7.6/10 | Registered 3.92 years, contributions span 5 calendar years |
| Original project quality | 5.7/18 | 5 original repos, 0 total stars across all of them; top repo aegis has a 0.95 content quality score but zero user traction |
| Contribution quality | 22.4/27 | 49 merged PRs out of 136 total; 26 maintainer-closed unmerged, 3 author-closed external, 1 author-closed own-repo |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 87 all-time contributions (65 PRs + 22 commits) to high-star popular repos including openclaw/openclaw (★381k), ollama/ollama (★175k), and langchain-ai/langchain (★140k); 48 of these lack file-level verification, so full quality of the impact set is unconfirmed |
| Community influence | 3.6/8 | 10 followers, 9 following — a near 1:1 ratio that suggests you follow people to get PR eyeballs, not the other way around |
| Activity authenticity | 17/17 | 3,175 contributions in the last year, last activity 1 day ago — the activity is real, even if most of it is patching other people's code |
Red flags
- 48 of your 65 all-time contributions to high-star popular repos have no file-level verification, so we can't confirm the quality of most of the work propping up your impact score.
- Two flood-style PR titles lurk in your history, but they were never merged and are not part of your recent merged PR sample, so they don't drag your score down much for now.
- Your
nandanadileep/MCP-Serverrepo contains a 1.4MB virtual environment file dump, a stunning display of personal repository hygiene that would make any DevOps engineer cry.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects your verified core code contributions to high-star repos, low trivial/templated PR ratio, and lack of unaddressed qualitative red flags, with no leftover signals to bump or haircut the total.
Verdict Normal trust profile. You can point to real external contributions to major open source projects, but your zero-star home turf, 35% maintainer PR rejection rate, and 195-fork hoarding habit leave plenty of surface area for skeptics to poke at.