ghfind
Anonymous浏览器数据工具常用,分实至名归
AnonymousHackBrowserData is my daily driver, well earned
Anonymous双修码农加安全匠,配置拉满
AnonymousStarred all his repos, this score is no cap
Anonymous开源劳模石锤,万星项目挨个star
AnonymousGo wizard shipping pentest tools, absolute legend
Anonymous94.7夯等级,网安劳模实锤
AnonymousPolyglot coder + OSS workhorse, straight fire
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality15.3 / 18
Contribution quality26.9 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.0 / 20
Community influence7.6 / 8
Activity authenticity15.9 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
Go96%
C4%
Makefile0%
Domains
golangmacoshackingkeychainsecuritybrowserbrowser-extensionchromeedgefirefoxpentest-toolwindows

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 9-year GitHub account that’s an OSS benchmark: HackBrowserData racks up 14k stars, almost no trivial PRs across 264 merges, and external contributions landed in Nuclei and Elastic Beats — this signal

moonD4rk — 94.70/100 · GOD (Legendary · Hall of Fame)

TL;DR: A high-signal OSS maintainer whose 14k-star HackBrowserData flagship carries almost all his star weight, but the core engineering quality is so strong that even the lopsided impact concentration can’t drag him below legendary.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/109.58 years registered, 11 years of active contribution streaks, last activity 0 days ago — this account has outlasted half the frameworks you use.
Original project quality15.3/1817 original repos, 14,354 total stars, 14,261 from the 0.85-quality HackBrowserData (a Go-based browser data extraction tool) — the rest of his repos are side project souvenirs, but that one flagship is a legitimate cybersecurity staple.
Contribution quality26.9/27264 merged PRs out of 276 total, 1% maintainer rejection rate, only 1 trivial PR in the recent 50-PR sample — no spam, no drive-by fixes, no worn-out close buttons on maintainer queues.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19/20160 PRs and 321 commits into popular repos all-time, with verified core engineering contributions to 29k-star Nuclei and Elastic Beats — he’s not just polishing his own project’s README, he’s shipping real code to the ecosystem’s biggest tools.
Community influence7.6/81,155 followers with only 430 follows, no follow-farming KPI chasing — people follow him for the tools, not the follower count.
Activity authenticity15.9/17679 contributions last year, 11 years of consistent activity, no bot-like spikes or long dormancy — this is a human who actually shows up to work.
Red flags
  • Impact is heavily concentrated in his own HackBrowserData repo (~87% of all popular-repo PRs), which is high-quality but means cross-community external contribution volume is low.
  • The recent 50-PR sample has zero external contributions, which underrepresents his cross-community work (he does have verified all-time external contributions to high-profile projects, they just don’t show up in the recent snapshot).
  • All external contributions are limited to 1 PR per repository, so he’s not a prolific external contributor to other people’s projects, even if the ones he does land are in top-tier repos. Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already priced in the strong original project quality, verified core contributions, and lack of farming signals. Verdict Normal, high-trust OSS maintainer. No indicators of botting, trivial farming, or score inflation — his contribution signal is as real as the 14k stars on HackBrowserData.