ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality7.9 / 18
Contribution quality18.1 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact9.2 / 20
Community influence3.9 / 8
Activity authenticity14.3 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
MDX55%
Swift42%
Python1%
Shell1%
HTML1%

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 16-year account with 30 self-hosted repos, only 6 total stars and a top repo of 2 stars. Follows 196 vs 85 followers, external contributions are all tiny side projects. GitHub is just an open-source r

moerdowo — 63.40/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: 16-year GitHub veteran with a barren self-hosted portfolio, modest external footnotes, and a follower deficit that makes his open-source profile look thinner than his repo READMEs.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 16 years, active across 17 contribution years, last activity 1 day ago. Tenure is the strongest part of this profile, which is not a high bar to clear.
Original project quality7.9/1830 original repos, only 6 total stars, top repo maxes at 2 stars. The entire self-hosted portfolio has fewer stars than a single popular Hacktoberfest typo-fix PR.
Contribution quality18.1/2714 merged PRs out of 18 total, 0 maintainer rejections, 1 self-closed external PR, 1 self-closed own-repo PR, 2 trivial recent PRs. The zero rejection rate is less a badge of quality and more a sign he only submits to repos that won't bounce him.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact9.2/20All popular-repo impact is confined to 2 PRs and 2 commits into a single 7.5k-star Raycast repo, plus tiny language/file contributions to two other projects. This is a daytrip to big-project ecosystems, not a residency.
Community influence3.9/885 followers vs 196 following. He follows twice as many people as follow him, a textbook follow-deficit that signals zero organic community pull.
Activity authenticity14.3/171257 contributions last year with no bot or farming flags, but most volume is churn on his own 30 tiny macOS repos and docs touch-ups, not meaningful open-source work.

Red flags No high-severity risk signals detected: no PR farming, no bot-like activity, no maintainer-rejected PRs, no star inflation patterns.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for the account's long tenure, modest original project traction, small but legitimate external contributions, and lack of anomalous behavior.

Verdict Normal, but aggressively average. This is a GitHub account that shows up, puts in consistent low-stakes work, and never aspires to be anything more than a footnote in other people's projects.