ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality3.6 / 18
Contribution quality19.3 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact8.1 / 20
Community influence4.6 / 8
Activity authenticity14.5 / 17

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 9-year account with zero stars across own repos, all your PR weight dumped into course homework and tiny others' projects — you welded a stack of PRs with zero core engineering impact, your open-sourc

MinecraftFuns — 60.10/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)

TL;DR: A 9-year GitHub account with zero stars across its own repos, all 30 merged PRs split between university coursework and tiny external projects, zero core engineering impact, and 176 days of inactivity — perfectly average, perfectly forgettable.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 9.36 years, active across 10 contribution years — the only thing that hasn't expired here is your account age, not your project momentum.
Original project quality3.6/18Two original public repos, zero total stars, top repo is a dormant 2021 Python Arweave peer scanner (ARScanner) that never gained any traction — your own code is a ghost town no one's ever forked or starred.
Contribution quality19.3/2730 merged out of 33 total PRs, 2 self-closed external PRs, zero maintainer rejections, but 5 of 30 recent merged PRs are docs/site/light touch-ups — most of your work is polishing other people's course and side project repos, not building core features.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact8.1/20All-time popular-repo footprint: 2 PRs + 1 commit into 2 high-star repos (1,354 ★ beeper/bridge-manager, 565 ★ isovalent/ebpf-docs), zero core engineering impacts, only 1 verified doc-like fix (the eBPF docs typo) — your all-time widely-used project contribution is smaller than a Hacktoberfest sticker.
Community influence4.6/848 followers, 31 following — you're not a community pillar, you're a casual browser who occasionally drops a PR into a classmate's repo.
Activity authenticity14.5/174,804 contributions last year, but 176 days since last activity — your contribution graph is a firework that fizzled out half a year ago, no recent sustained work.

Red flags

  • Zero stars across both of your original public repos, with your most starred project (ARScanner) last pushed in 2021 and never gaining any traction.
  • All-time popular-repo contributions cap out at 2 PRs with zero core engineering impact: your only verified high-star work is a 2-file doc fix in isovalent/ebpf-docs, no actual code contributions to widely used projects.
  • 176 days of complete inactivity as of the data fetch date, with no recent sustained work despite a spike of 4,804 contributions last year.
  • Nearly 60% of your recent merged PRs target a single university course repository (CSC207-2024/safeTO), with most changes being lightweight config tweaks, script moves, or minor feature additions to a student project, not production-grade open source.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your zero-star original repos, docs-heavy contribution mix, and tiny all-time popular-repo footprint.

Verdict Normal, unremarkable open-source participant. You're not faking activity or spamming PRs, but you're also not leaving any meaningful engineering footprint — your GitHub profile is a perfectly average student project portfolio, nothing more.