ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality12.3 / 18
Contribution quality24.2 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact20.0 / 20
Community influence5.8 / 8
Activity authenticity17.0 / 17

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 7-year GitHub account with only 69 followers, 136 PRs and 1084 commits to top-tier projects like ant-design and Apache ECharts, yet your only decent project VRCX-0 only has 109 stars, plus 5 identical

Map1en — 89.10/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)

TL;DR: A highly active, low-noise developer with strong core contributions to top-tier open source projects and a well-maintained personal project, no red flags, elite-tier trust and value.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered ~7.87 years, active across 9 contribution years
Original project quality12.3/184 original non-empty public repos; top project VRCX-0 (109 stars, 0.95 quality score, actively maintained Tauri/Rust VRCX rewrite with multi-language READMEs)
Contribution quality24/27148 merged PRs out of 165 total PRs; 10 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 6 author-closed external PRs, 1 author-closed own-repo PR; 6% maintainer rejection rate, 0 external trivial PRs
Ecosystem / maintenance impact20/20136 all-time substantial PRs/commits across 16 popular open source repos, including 14 PRs to 98k-star ant-design, contributions to Apache Superset, Apache ECharts, 27k-star element-plus, mayocream/koharu, and vrcx-team/VRCX; 1084 total impact commits, 71 verified PRs with file-level samples showing core code changes
Community influence5.8/869 followers, following 12 (healthy ~5.75x follower/following ratio, no follow-farming behavior)
Activity authenticity17/172154 contributions in the past year, last activity today, 4 distinct activity types (commits, PRs, issues, etc.)

Red flags: None (no follow farming, trivial PR farming, templated PR flooding, star inflation, or other suspicious behavior detected) Manual adjustment: None (0) — no formula errors or missed negative/positive signals identified; all contributions are substantive, no farming patterns, original project is a usable high-quality tool, and external contributions are primarily core code changes to popular repos. Verdict: Prioritize — elite-tier developer with consistent, high-quality contributions to both personal and top-tier open source projects, no trust concerns, strong candidate for collaboration or employment.