🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
Custom CTF Challenge Attack Scripts.
PythonGenerate insightful charts about your sleep patterns, steps, and activity trends from the data exported from Mi Fitness.
PythonConfig files for my GitHub profile.
A aync code judger for Putong OJ using go-judge sandbox.
PythonJust a personal working repository. Redirect to acm309/PutongOJ for more information.
TypeScriptA PyTorch-based system for recognizing Hei.Captcha GIF captchas, developed for security research purposes.
Python🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 With 59 followers and 107 follows, you're a GitHub simp who pads their resume with doc translations for Astro and unverified PRs to Typecho's 12k-star repo. Your 9 original repos top out at 9 stars, 7
luoingly — 60.00/100 · NPC (Average · Unremarkable)
TL;DR: A GitHub account that’s 90% resume theater: 4 years of activity, zero meaningful core engineering impact, original projects with almost no traction, and a contribution profile built on low-value docs work and self-serve PRs to its own zero-star project.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 8/10 | Registered 4.3 years, active across 5 contribution years, last activity 17 days ago. Four years on the platform and the most usable thing you’ve built is a 9-star CTF script collection. |
| Original project quality | 7.6/18 | 9 original repos, 17 total stars, top-starred original repo (attack-scripts) has a usability quality score of 0.42, and your highest-quality repo (putong-oj) has zero stars. Your home turf is a barren wasteland with a single overgrown weed. |
| Contribution quality | 20.2/27 | 58 merged PRs out of 62 total, 0 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 1 author-closed external PR, 2 author-closed own-repo PRs, but 77% of all PRs target your own zero-star putong-oj repo and 56% of recent external PRs are docs/site work. You’re a full-time employee of your own project, a part-time docs janitor for everyone else’s. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 4/20 | All-time 13 PRs + 14 commits into popular repos (★12,390 typecho, ★2,352 github/advisory-database, ★1,651 withastro/docs), 0 core impact PRs, 5 doc-like impact PRs, impact capped due to docs-heavy, weakly verified contributions. Your "ecosystem work" is just window dressing on other people’s projects, no actual engineering lift. |
| Community influence | 4.2/8 | 59 followers, 107 following — you follow more people than follow you, a classic open-source simp ratio with no star power to back up the follow count. |
| Activity authenticity | 17/17 | 2246 contributions last year across 4 activity types, 5 active contribution years. You’re clearly active, but all that activity is concentrated in docs work and your own zero-star project instead of meaningful engineering. |
Red flags
- Almost all all-time popular-repo contributions are docs translations, upstream syncs, or trivial security advisory edits, with zero core engineering PRs — your ecosystem impact is entirely surface-level.
- Your top-starred original repo (attack-scripts) has a usability quality score of 0.42, so its 9 stars are vanity metrics with no real project value.
- 77% of your merged PRs target your own zero-star putong-oj repo, so your contribution footprint is mostly self-serving rather than adding external value.
- You have 2 bulk "sync from upstream" PRs to your forked cyberchef repo, which are high-churn, low-value contributions that add no original work.
Score calibration The base score was 61, which exceeded the 60-point cap for accounts with docs-heavy, weakly verified ecosystem impact. We adjusted the final score down by 1 point to 60 to align with the cap, as your popular-repo contributions are almost entirely non-core work (docs, translations, upstream syncs) with no verified core engineering impact.
Verdict Normal. No red flags for bad behavior, but also no signal of meaningful engineering impact, original project traction, or core contribution value — you’re the open-source equivalent of a participation trophy.