ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality6.6 / 18
Contribution quality24.5 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.8 / 20
Community influence6.4 / 8
Activity authenticity16.4 / 17

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 13 years on GitHub, 1089 yearly contributions, zero star/PR farming, core code to top-tier repos like Scala3—academia's rare actual open-source workhorse, not the awesome-list curating type

LPTK — 78.70/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: A low-profile academic developer with genuine core contributions to major open-source projects, no farming behavior, high and consistent activity, a solid and trustworthy contributor.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10registered 13.71 yrs, active 15 yrs
Original project quality6.6/18total stars 252, max stars 177 (simple-sub); best original repo quality score 0.8 (simpler-sub), top-starred original repo quality score 0.22 (simple-sub)
Contribution quality24.5/27merged PRs 112, total PRs 129; maintainer-closed unmerged PRs 3, author-closed external PRs 8, author-closed own-repo PRs 0
Ecosystem / maintenance impact13.8/2079 substantive PRs/commits into ★6,265 (scala/scala3), ★3,149 (emeryberger/CSrankings), ★1,135 (com-lihaoyi/fastparse), and ★221 (hkust-taco/mlscript) repos (all-time, see impact_repos)
Community influence6.4/8followers 168, following 5 (no follow-farming behavior)
Activity authenticity16.4/17last-year contributions 1089, active across 15 contribution years, days since last activity 2

Red flags: None Manual adjustment: +1, for genuine core code contributions to high-star external repositories (scala3, CSrankings, fastparse) and consistent, farming-free high activity across 15 years. Verdict: Prioritize, normal trusted contributor.