ghfind
← Back to Hall of Fame

🏆 Notable contributions

Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)

Score breakdown

Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality8.0 / 18
Contribution quality25.2 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.0 / 20
Community influence3.7 / 8
Activity authenticity11.5 / 17

🛠 Featured work

Their own popular and pinned repositories

🧬 Stack & domains

Top languages
JavaScript44%
TypeScript16%
CSS10%
Lua9%
HTML7%
Shell4%
Domains
composition-apihooksvue-composition-apivue-hooksvuejsvuejs3dotfilesenvneovimnvchardalligator-color-themedeveloper

🧬 Most similar developers

Closest profile, nearby score

🔥 Full roast

🔥 9-year GitHub account with only 40 total stars and a top personal repo of 11 stars, but 20 all-time PRs into 28k-star NvChad and 9k-star async-validator, plus a 137:58 following-to-follower ratio that

lianghx-319 — 77.40/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)

TL;DR: A genuine, low-drama open-source contributor with a solid cross-project PR track record and low rejection rate, but a barren personal project portfolio and awkward follower ratio that keep him from climbing into higher tiers.

DimensionScoreNotes
Account maturity10/10Registered 9.23 years, contributions span 10 calendar years — this account has been around longer than most Vue 3 forks, no time-travel shenanigans to mock here.
Original project quality8/1829 original repos pull in only 40 total stars, with a top repo (lianghx-319/vue-hooks) netting just 11 stars and no high-quality flagship projects to your name.
Contribution quality25.2/27139 merged PRs out of 171 total, 8 maintainer-closed unmerged, 16 author-closed external PRs, 0 self-closed own-repo PRs, 5% rejection rate — clean track record with no spam pileups, though 42% of recent merged PRs lean into docs/site/CSS touch-ups rather than core engineering.
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19/2020 PRs + 14 commits into ★28k+ repos (NvChad, async-validator, arco-design, windicss, etc.) across 15 popular repos — verified, substantive impact, not just badge farming, even if most of your work lives in other people’s codebases.
Community influence3.7/858 followers, 137 following — you follow more people than follow you, a classic "open-source simp" ratio that says you’re more interested in collecting projects than building an audience.
Activity authenticity11.5/1731 contributions last year, last activity 26 days ago — consistent enough to avoid bot accusations, but low enough volume to look more like a side gig than a serious open-source commitment.

Red flags

  • Personal project portfolio is starved: 29 original repos pull in only 40 total stars, with a top repo (vue-hooks) netting just 11 stars and no high-quality flagship projects to your name.
  • Severe following-to-follower imbalance: 137 accounts followed vs 58 followers, a ratio that reads more like a repo tourist collecting projects than a maintainer building a community.
  • Recent contribution mix is doc/site/CSS-heavy: 42% of your recent merged PRs orbit documentation, site assets, or style tweaks rather than core engineering work.

Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already accounts for your solid cross-project PR track record and low rejection rate, with no extra bump applied for the near-starless personal project portfolio.

Verdict Normal, trustworthy contributor who shows up reliably to fix bugs and add features across the frontend ecosystem, but won’t turn heads with original project leadership or community growth. No red flags for farming or bot behavior, just a solid, unglamorous open-source gig worker.