🏆 Notable contributions
Popular open-source repos they've shipped to (commits + PRs)
Score breakdown
🛠 Featured work
Their own popular and pinned repositories
🧬 Stack & domains
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 Registered for nearly a decade with only 14 followers, spamming 28 PRs on the 147k-star Dify repo to buff his GitHub resume, 68 personal repos with less than 100 total stars, not a single presentable
JunIce — 78.20/100 · SOLID (Solid · Trustworthy)
TL;DR: Genuine engineering work in high-star ecosystems, but your 98-star home turf and 67% Dify PR concentration make this look like a résumé cover, not a standalone open-source portfolio.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 9.91 years, active across 11 contribution years, last activity 0 days ago. A decade on GitHub and your most popular original repo hasn't been touched since 2020 — consistency is a skill, I guess. |
| Original project quality | 10.6/18 | 68 original repos, 98 total stars, top repo react-native-scroll-customTabBar (70 ★, quality score 0.75). 68 original repos, 98 total stars, and your most popular project is a 5-year-old React Native tab bar tweak — your home turf is a ghost town with a "no stars allowed" sign. |
| Contribution quality | 22.9/27 | 60 merged PRs out of 77 total, 2 maintainer-closed unmerged PRs, 13 author-closed external PRs, 0 self-closed own-repo PRs, 3% overall rejection rate. 13 of your external PRs were closed by you, not maintainers — nice of you to clean up your own messy half-finished contributions before anyone else has to. |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 20/20 | 50 PRs + 46 commits into 12 popular repos with a combined ★ total exceeding 400k (all-time, verified samples confirm real code changes, not just docs/site touch-ups). You've shipped real code to high-star projects, but 67% of your recent PRs target a single 147k-star repo — diversity isn't just a salad bar, you know. |
| Community influence | 2.8/8 | 14 followers, 33 following. 14 followers after 10 years on GitHub? You follow more people than follow you, which is the open-source equivalent of being the person who shows up to the party alone and leaves with someone else's leftovers. |
| Activity authenticity | 11.9/17 | 46 contributions last year, 3 distinct activity types, 0 days since last activity. 46 contributions last year is solid, but nearly 30% of your recent merged PRs are trivial doc/site/CSS touch-ups — you're not shipping code, you're polishing other people's windows. |
Red flags
- Single-repo overexposure: 67% of your recent PRs and over half of your all-time popular-repo contributions target langgenius/dify (147k ★). The work is genuine, but a healthy contributor profile shouldn't rely on one project for most of its visible impact.
- Self-closed external PR volume: 13 external PRs were closed by you, not maintainers. The overall rejection rate is low (3%) and verified samples don't show spam, but that's still a non-trivial number of contributions you walked back on your own.
- Barren home turf: 68 original repos, only 98 total stars, your most popular project hasn't been updated since 2020, and several repos have empty or near-empty READMEs. You're a prolific contributor to other people's projects, but you haven't built anything of your own worth starring.
Score calibration No extra adjustment. The base score already reflects your genuine ecosystem contributions, but the weak original project portfolio and single-repo concentration keep it from climbing higher.
Verdict Solid, trustworthy contributor with real engineering work in high-star open-source projects. That said, your GitHub profile reads more like a résumé cover letter for other people's repos than a showcase of your own work — go build something people actually want to star for once.