← Back to Hall of Fame
🔍 Fetching their open-source footprint (repos / languages / contributions)…
Score breakdown
Account maturity10.0 / 10
Original project quality10.7 / 18
Contribution quality25.7 / 27
Ecosystem / maintenance impact19.8 / 20
Community influence5.6 / 8
Activity authenticity15.1 / 17
🧬 Most similar developers
Closest profile, nearby score
🔥 Full roast
🔥 10-year GitHub account with 226 total stars, nearly a third of your recent PRs are unpaid translation grunt work for open source, plus duplicate CI fixes to a 2-star repo — at least your Hackintosh gu
ilharp — 86.90/100 · ELITE (Elite · Top-tier dev)
TL;DR: A consistent, long-tenured contributor with real impact on major open source projects, whose own niche tools and translation work carry modest visibility but no red flags.
| Dimension | Score | Notes |
|---|---|---|
| Account maturity | 10/10 | Registered 10 years, active across 11 years |
| Original project quality | 10.7/18 | 53 original repos, 47 non-empty, total 226 stars, top repo 57 stars |
| Contribution quality | 25.7/27 | 165 merged PRs out of 189 total, 11% rejection rate, only 2 external trivial PRs |
| Ecosystem / maintenance impact | 19.8/20 | 56 substantive PRs/commits to ★… repos including Vite (81k ⭐), Avalonia (31k ⭐), Taro (37k ⭐), and koishi (5.6k ⭐) |
| Community influence | 5.6/8 | 234 followers, 176 following, no follow farming patterns |
| Activity authenticity | 15.1/17 | 332 contributions in the last year, last activity 4 days ago, consistent multi-year activity |
Red flags: None Manual adjustment: None (0) — no unaccounted-for farming, spam, or low-effort bulk behavior detected beyond low-value Crowdin translation PRs already partially accounted for in the base score. Verdict: Normal, contributions are welcome, no blocking recommended.